A couple of weeks ago I read that the November 2011 issue of Marie Claire South Africa featured several thought-provoking ad campaigns by major advertising agencies on the topic of “Love Your Body.” I thought it would be wonderful to showcase this in my documentary “The Illusionists.” Thanks to the fabulous Jill Greenberg, who’s a Facebook fan of the project based in South Africa, this past Saturday I received a copy of the special issue in the mail. And I have to say, I was in for a BIG surprise.
A more accurate title for this issue should have been: “Please hate your body and buy our advertisers’ products.” Yes, it’s that bad.
The person chosen for the cover of the special “Love Your Body Issue” is statuesque supermodel Candice Swanepoel, wearing a bikini.
To her left, you can see the following headlines:
- 21 DAYS TO GET BIKINI READY
- TSELANE TAMBO ON LIFE AFTER LIPO
- WIN: FREEZE YOUR FAT OFF!
And finally, in huge bold letters: Special Issue. LOVE YOUR BODY. 6 TOP SA AD AGENCIES COMPETE TO SHOW YOU HOW.
The first thing that one notices while turning the pages of the magazine is that it looks just like any other issue of a major fashion magazine, full of ads for cosmetics and luxury brands, and showcasing young, extremely thin models – whose pictures are thoroughly airbrushed, even in “candid” photos.
Like this one for instance:
After 40-something pages of advertising and galleries showing the latest beauty products and fashion accessories, the special “Love Your Body” section debuts, with various thought-provoking ad campaigns by South Africa’s top ad agencies.
TBWA shows the painting of Botticelli’s Birth of Venus. Underneath it, the headline: “Why change a masterpiece, you’re beautiful the way you are.“
Next, an ad by Saatchi and Saatchi, showing the corpse of an older woman on a metal table. The headline: “When will you stop worrying about your appearance? Love the body you live in.”
Case in point:
Left: the ad by Canvas Lifestyle, showing a Barbie doll with several markings on her body. “Add cellulite from favorite heavenly chocolate brownies” … “Add caesarian scar from your first-born son” … “Add laugh lines from girls’ night out” …
Right: An ad for the Burberry fragrance “BODY” with a model who looks like a real life Barbie doll. Which is kind of contradictory, no?
Next ad:
Left: a simple message by TBWA. “IMPERFECT. I’M PERFECT. Start seeing things the way you really are.“
Right: an ad for the Dolce & Gabbana fragrance “Light Blue” – with flawless looking models whose bodies are thoroughly airbrushed.
Next:
Left: a collage of photos by Kristina Stojilokovic that says, “Which part of your body would the people who love you change?” with close-up images of women’s bodies: a woman’s freckles, a big scar, knees, a belly button, a mole.
Right: an ad for L’Oréal Revitalift. With the big headline “FIGHT THE 10 SIGNS OF AGEING, IN A SINGLE GESTURE.“
Less wrinkles
Smoother skin
Firmer skin
Rehydrated skin
More flexible skin
Suppler skin
Even skin tone
Radiant skin
Refined pores
Defined facial countours
The rest of the magazine doesn’t fare so well.
There are articles like: “I GREW HAIR ON MY CHIN” – “LIFE AFTER LIPO” and “HOW OLD ARE THESE WOMEN?” which asks readers to guess the ages of six women.
Then: “4 Ways to Get Beach Body” Ready
The final verdict: I would give this special issue a “FAIL” grade – on all fronts. The only diversity it showcases is racial: thankfully there are many African models represented. Problem is: they all have the same age and body type. ALL OF THEM. Every photo is thoroughly airbrushed, giving women a plastic / Barbie-doll-like quality. Including most of the “love your body” ads. This issue is the equivalent of the Big Bad Wolf disguised as Little Red Riding Hood’s grandmother. And this is quite sad, considering the opportunity Marie Claire had to promote positive body image.
To read more on the topic, check out my April 2010 review of Marie Claire France: “100% Without Airbrushing.
Originally published at The Illusionists. Cross-posted with permission.
A total fail on the magazine’s behalf – excellent job to you.
I agree that it was a fail. But I don’t think the TBWA ad is that bad really!
Your write-up of this is great. I agree this magazine fails. What hypocrisy!!!
Sadly, I think most women’s glossies would fail the litmus test of advocacy (Camel cigarette ads placed next to health articles, as someone mentioned above) when scrutinized so closely. However, Marie Claire invited it with their tease of a headline to LOVE YOUR BODY, when all of the nuances communicate that you absolutely must buy their products and follow their guidance to get a body worth loving.
I think they tried,but the ads just contradicted the whole point of the issue.Such is the airbrushed world we live in….
I stopped looking at those kind of magazines when I was 19, you just reminded me why, thank you. Shame on them, shame on their art director and editor. and shame for the poor ladies who read their publication.
Q: “What would it take for you to love your body?” A: For you to stop publishing ridiculously unrealistic images of half-naked women. 🙂 Really, this whole issue is just covered in wrong sauce. Further proof that we can’t rely on big media to get our message across. The idea that big media is now appropriating body image for its own profit motives much the way it has used the environmental movement to promote more consumerism scares me more than a little bit.
I particularly love how you’ve called out the editors on ad placement. Back in the day, when I used to read Cosmo, I always thought it was strange that they would put ads for Camel Turkish cigarettes next to health articles.
although i adore barbie and thin girls, i will agree with you, 100%, that this issue is a big failure in terms of promoting love of one’s body. x