Walt Disney and Me (Black and Disabled)

Cinderella

By Cynthia Barram

I have an incredible love-hate relationship with Mr. Disney. The first time my dad wheeled me and my chair into a theater we watched The Little Mermaid. The lyrics from Ariel’s “Part of Your World,” pierced me. She equated so much of being human and happy with walking. But before Ariel, no one had articulated my secret childhood longing to dance, to move. And Iin could move so much easier in the water. I could swim, walk, jump, and hold my breath until adults made fools of themselves trying to save me from a pool. Ariel convinced me that a secret society of mermaids waited beneath every puddle for my orphan soul to rejoin them. Years later, I realized that Disney’s portrayal of Ariel as wearing only a bra for the first half of her movie, and as silent, lovingly clueless, and unrelentingly sexy for the second half was a serious problem from a feminist perspective. But honestly, if I woke up one morning with white skin, a petite build, an able body, and red hair I would train my voice to hilt, move to Los Angeles, force Disneyland to hire me, and sing that song with more conviction than anyone who had never been in a wheelchair ever could.

Cinderella presented me with other problems. I fell in love with her because of her ability to “buck up” under difficult circumstances. Mimicking her came in handy on days when Dad was irate, Mom was clueless, and my two sisters were evil. I would have swapped her housework for my surgeries in a heartbeat. Secretly I hoped that, like her, I could have mice and a fairy-godmother that would not rest until they had given me the means to accomplish all I dreamt of. I believed that at some point, the trauma I had suffered as a child, my scars, would vanish and give way to new life. Not exactly.

Cerebral palsy, though not unlovable, can be a clumsy thing. I would never acquire Cinderella’s ability to move and behave with absolute grace in every situation. And the other side of the mirror would never show me Cindy’s pretty blue eyes, blonde hair, hourglass figure, or perfect toeless Barbie doll feet. Never mind that my biological mother actually had blue eyes and blonde hair. My coffee with cream skin, midnight eyes, and black-cat no-I-will-not-get-into-braids-until-I-am-properly-stroked hair that I inherited from my biological father were having none of it. Cinderella indeed!

Mom would smile at me through her wily green-eyes as she attempted to ameliorate some of this tragedy every summer:

“You’re getting tan faster than me. Stop it!” she would scold me in her play voice.

“You’re not going to beat me,” I would retort, “Give up.”

“Never!” she would howl before we both busted a gut. But Cinderella’s white-is-good-and-pure mentality still etched itself into my adopted brain.

One Christmas I asked my mother, “Black people don’t go to heaven, do they mamma?”

In utter shock, Mom asked me where I heard such a thing. I told her, “Well, I have never seen a Black angel. They all have blond hair and blue eyes.” She sent my father to Atlanta promptly and he returned with a framed picture of a Black angel and the same of a Black Jesus. Every couple of Christmases thereafter relatives would bring Black Marys, Black fairies, a music box where a Black girl held a bright red present, and even my first Black baby doll—a chubby, smiling little girl who I promptly named Natasha. Yet, these toys were often the first to end up horribly mutilated. I wasn’t killing them on purpose, but I would subject them to my inherent clumsiness a lot faster than my more fragile, white toys.

I spent a lot of time at the library in third grade investigating Cinderella. I found out that she had red hair, brown hair, and black hair. I found out that she was a lovely Black woman (also named Natasha) who grew up in Africa, and had “counterparts” all over the globe. I found out that other princess stories like Snow White, Sleeping Beauty, and Beauty and the Beast were similarly archetypal and had heroines from France, Italy, China, Egypt, Appalachia, everywhere. But all this cultural education did not stop me from making remarks like, “Oh my God! I have never seen so many Black people in all my life! They are everywhere!” When my father took me to see an Andrae Crouch concert, he told me, “You’re Black, now hush!” It was the only discussion Dad and I had about my race. That blue-eyed Cinderella was still the woman to conquer.

And things got worse. I used to watch Dumbo on Disney channel looking for the black crows. They are still my favorite part of the movie. In their defense (and mine) I never thought they were vicious—just jovial, excellent at wordplay, and a little sarcastic. I mean, let’s face it. They taught Dumbo how to fly, and stuck by him to keep him out of trouble at the end of the movie. Without them, Dumbo and his smart talking little mouse would be nothing. I took a Jazz, Pop, and Rock music class during my freshman year of college, and learned the origins of the blues and scat that made me love those animated crows. I also learned that associating any Black person with a crow, with Jim Crow in fact, was a horrible and hideous thing to do. Jim Crow was the name of a so-called code of conduct, which basically gave Whites pseudo-legal license to persecute and murder Blacks. No wonder Dumbo isn’t shown on public television anymore! And yet, may God help me, I still miss those crows. It’s not every day that a person meets friends who can laugh playfully at themselves and at you, and who have no qualms when it comes to teaching the down-and-out of how to fly.

My most shameful, and yet somehow most beloved Disney movie was Peter Pan. My favorite parts of this movie were the scenes with the “Indians”. As much as the chief terrified me when he promised to “burn ‘em at stake” if they could not rescue his daughter Tiger Lily, I loved watching the dignified way the young princess completely ignored Captain Hook as he screamed empty threats of death in her face to try and make her give up Peter Pan. I couldn’t believe her bravery and faith. She never cried out not even when she was about to drown. She knew that Pan would come for her and he did. And, when she was returned to the tribe, the same chief who had been ready to barbecue the Lost Boys earlier, invited everyone to a dance party to celebrate. It was very gracious of him I thought, and in the end he also turned out to have a sense of humor, which made him not nearly as scary. So, I made a note in my then very elastic seven-year-old brain: These red men are friendly and fun-loving people who throw better parties and can boogie down better than anyone you have ever seen. In sixth grade, a Native American dance troop performed at my school.  They did tricks with hoops and used feathers to make eagle shadows that swooped and soared across the gym floor. I was impressed, but not the least bit surprised.

Disney chose to draw the Indians in Peter Pan as bad caricatures—men as overly skinny, women as fat and toothless. What’s more, the word squaw is used three times in that movie. As a child, I asked my father what it meant and he told me it was the Indian way of saying girl. Similarly, my sisters and I used to play Indians after or during the movie. We had fake war cries and all, and those games are one of the only times I remember us running around with absolute abandon, and reveling in our ability to make noise. When my cousin’s kids met my family and I in South Dakota last year for a family reunion I remember remarking more than once, “Geez, they are like wild Indians,” as her home-schooled children whooped and hollered and stretched their bare limbs racing toward the swimming pool like their lives depended on it. They were free, yes. They were elated, yes. But did that make them “wild Indians” necessarily? Where had I learned to talk like that? My earliest and most overt teacher had been that old Peter Pan movie.

And so the queer play goes on in my head: Images of red men, black crows, and blonde Cinderellas swirl, their racist-sexist-classist messages intermingling with the pain and perfume of my childhood. What if Tiger Lilly had been able to speak? Would Dumbo be so different if the crows had been animated as cats? If Cinderella was just a little bit clumsy and perhaps had acne, would her film be ruined? And would it kill the Little Mermaid if Ariel at some point, kind of enjoyed her thinly-veiled wheelchairedness? Yet, I can never truly bring myself to hate Mr. Disney. Granted, should I have children I will not let my kids watch his dusty, old films—they lead to confusion. But part of me will always laugh at the crows in Dumbo. I’ll laugh at my fond memories of playing with my sisters. I’ll laugh because Mr. Disney introduced me to the concept of play and humor. I will laugh until somebody comes up with stories that are more engaging and entertaining, without being so off color.

* * *

Today’s contributor, Cynthia Barram is 26, an avid concert goer, an activist, and an English major. She lives with a cat who thinks she is both rich and human. Cynthia treats her wheelchair like a race car or a Queen’s throne depending on the day, and her second home is the bus station.

Disney-Related Content on Adios Barbie:

Tangled: Going Beyond the Disney Mold

Disney’s First Black Princess Makes Us Wonder

Are Your Roots Bad for Business?

Finally! The Truth About “Happily Ever After” Revealed

 

Post to Twitter

Plastic Wrap–Turning Against Cosmetic Surgery

by jassy165

Trend Line is Clear: Decline since 2004

By Margaret Morganroth Gullette

It was a shock to find after I had a squamous cell carcinoma removed from the side of my nose that I needed cosmetic surgery. I trusted my surgeon, and I trust she did as good a job as she could. But as I feared, the repair didn’t go well: the scar is still red, with a “pincushion effect,” so common it has a name. My face is no longer as symmetrical. I can’t believe anybody undergoes this voluntarily.

It may be hard to believe, but like me, American culture is turning against cosmetic surgery. Even in the movie business. An award-winning producer named Melanie Coombs observed after attending the Oscars that it was “like being at Madame Tussaud’s except they were live people.” The facial procedures called “non-invasive” are also a no-no. Martin Scorsese and Baz Luhrmann have publicly voiced their opposition to the use of Botox, frustrated by difficulties in finding actors able to express nonverbal emotion, especially anger, according to cultural critic Grayson Cooke.1 As Luhrmann notes, “their faces really can’t move properly.”

“Natural” is beginning to look good. Websites make fun of botched surgeries, showing photos of people’s unwanted post-op appearances–men as well as women. People report they look worse After. Characteristic consequences–the “wind-tunnel look,” the mismatched tiny chin, “waxworks,” skin like plastic wrap–are now uncool, according to many nonusers interviewed by sociologist Abigail Brooks of Boston College. America the Beautiful, one scary documentary, let’s a former anchor describe how facial surgery gave her permanent neuralgia, destroying her health and career. Many users do it only once. “Never again.”

Potential clients rationally fear death. When Kanye West’s mother and Olivia Goldsmith, author of the First Wives’ Club died, the lethal consequences began been piling up. Although there is still no register of mortality statistics, there are more exposés, like HBO’s special, “Plastic Disasters.” Even finding a surgeon who is certified and experienced is no guarantee of survival. The author of How We Die, Sherwin Nuland, pointed out the irony that “doctors who choose to perform an operation that is solely cosmetic are willing to accept mortality and complication rates significantly higher than those who restrict their interventions to those required for the treatment of disease.”

Ageism is a killer in this as in other ways. Most cosmetic surgery is driven by fear of aging-past-youth. In 2007 the average age of those receiving cosmetic surgery in the United States was 42.6. “Passing” as younger was promoted for decades by surgeons who didn’t have enough reconstructive work. The Federal Trade Commission under Nixon and then the Supreme Court made it illegal for the AMA to forbid surgeons from advertising. Third-party financing of procedures brought operations within the reach of lower-income women.

Fashion and celebrity magazines made seeking slender youthfulness seem obligatory. “Forcibly lowered self-esteem looks to the sufferer like real ‘ugliness’,” Naomi Wolf explained. It began to be said that every narrow departure from the ideal, including normal processes of female maturity (e.g., change in size after pregnancy, wrinkles) could be sold to consumers as a deformity. Other kinds of doctors without appropriate training or certification moved to supplement their practices by pursuing anxious patients’ discretionary income. Promoters said, gaily, this is an unstoppable trend. Feminists, gagging, agreed.

The promotion of plastic surgery constitutes an ethical crisis of national dimensions, since the ugliness effect impinges on people only because they are growing older. People who would never visit a surgeon are thrown into some degree of self-hatred; and younger people may look with disfavor on faces and bodies that are simply doing what comes naturally.

Trend Finally Going the Other Way

Yet the good news is that the trend is finally going the other way. Fact: The number of total cosmetic procedures reached a peak in 2004 (at 11,855,000), and has dropped every year since, according to data from ASAPS, which extrapolates the data from those of its board-certified surgeons who respond. (Perhaps the ones who write in are still in business and doing well). In 2010 the total was down to 9,336,000–a decrease of over 20% from 2004.2 (The numbers dropped even before the economic crisis of 2008.)

Surgeries–the most dangerous procedures–have also dropped, from 2.1 million in 2004, to 1.6 million in 2010–a drop of almost 25%. Breast augmentation was 334,00 in 2004; now only 318,000 in 2010. Lipoplasty was 478,251 in 2004; now only 289,016 in 2010.

The numbers for breast augmentation, the highest in invasive surgeries, dropped 11% from 2007 to 2008 and are lower in 2010. There is new evidence of cancer surrounding the breast in women with implants, which surgeons in both ASAPS and ASPS had been told in a webinar to downplay, Public Citizen’s Health Letter reported in February.3

Seeing the trend away from their invasions, surgeons now pay for ads offering “unfixed”-looking procedures. The top five procedures for women 35 to 50 in 2010 were all skin-related, like Botox.

After the age of fifty, the percentage of women obtaining any procedure drops dramatically, from 44-47% depending on the year, to about 25%. And fortunately for everyone but surgeons seeking trade, the older half of the “Boomers” has aged beyond the high-risk period–ages 35-50–at which women are most vulnerable. They have grown up and turned away.

Contrary to the myth, people are not going abroad for procedures. Brandon Alleman and his colleagues of the University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine in Iowa City, conducted a survey of businesses engaged in facilitating overseas medical travel for U.S. residents. The companies that completed the survey–representing around 70 percent of the market–had referred about 13,500 U.S. patients for care overseas, a number far lower than prior reports of between 500,000 and 2 million.4

Growing popular distaste also involves heightened aversion to danger and care for health. “First, do no harm,” critics enjoin cosmetic surgeons.

Why is “natural” looking better, aside from the fear of pain, deformity, death, and looking unfashionable?

Nonusers told sociologist Abigail Brooks that they not only find the “fixed” looks of others repugnant, they resist the ideologies behind the ageist beauty myth. They may be inspired by feminist theory, women’s-health activists, or the positive-aging movement. “Natural” to them means accepting and appreciating the body’s own processes and valuing maturity on many other measures.5 Maybe some female Boomers are indeed changing, aging-past-youth in America, one refusal at a time!

In 1992, despite normalizing trends, the number of cosmetic surgeries in the US was still relatively small. By 2004 it had grown vertiginously. Since then it has started to drop. There are still powerful forces promoting the procedures to women of a certain age–including the companies that fire employees in their middle years on the assumption that they are “too old.” Women sue for age discrimination ten years younger than men. As sexist ageism gets worse, surgeons and magazines and yes, even friends, falsely promise a response by calling the procedures “anti-aging.”

Newspapers still publish articles based on statistics from the surgeons’ self-serving organizational press-releases, emphasizing what rates are up (as the New York Times did recently, in an article by Tara Parker-Pope with the headline, “A Decade of Boosting Breast Size”).6 Rates for some procedures may go up in any given year, but the trend line is clear, as the article was forced to note. Journalists can be guilty not only of implying that getting fixed is popular and “normal,” they are missing the real story.

Make no mistake, millions still go under the knife. The number of surgeries still constitutes a public health emergency that needs to be addressed with a registry of deaths and disfigurements and with better certification. But eventually we may say that the Era of Normalized Sexist Ageism lasted not much more than 12 years.

© 2011 Margaret Morganroth Gullette

* * *

Margaret Morganroth Gullette is the author of Agewise: Fighting the New Ageism in America (U of Chicago Press, April) and is a Resident Scholar at the Women’s Studies Research Center, Brandeis University. She is the author of four books in age studies. Aged by Culture (also University of Chicago Press), was chosen a Noteworthy Book of the year by the Christian Science Monitor. It was nominated for a Pulitzer and received an Honorable Mention from the Gustavus Myers Center for the Study of Bigotry and Human Rights. Declining to Decline: Cultural Combat and the Politics of the Midlife won the Emily Toth award in 1998 for the best feminist book on American popular culture. Her first book in age studies is Safe at Last in the Middle Years. To read about Margaret Morganroth Gullette’s Free High School for Adults visit www.newtonsanjuan.org and click on “Adult Education.”

—————

1. Cooke, Grayson, “Effacing the Face: Botox and the Anarchic Archive,” Body & Society 2008 14:23.

2. My data is all from ASAPS: http://www.surgery.org/sites/default/files/2009trends.pdf surgery.org/sites/default/files/2007/Surgical_nonsurgical.pdf and Quick Facts for many of the years under investigation (2004-2010).  Other references are in the chapter “Plastic Wrap” from my book Agewise.

3. Public Citizen, “Health Letter,” February 2011 (Vol 27 #2).

4. Reported by Peeples, Lynne, “Few Americans travel overseas for medical care,” Reuters, Dec. 31, 2010. Retrieved at http:/ /uk.reuters.com/article/2010/12/31/health-us-travel-overseas-idUKTRE6BU28C20101231.

5. Brooks, Abigail, “Growing Older in a Surgical Age: An Analysis of Women’s Lived Experiences and Interpetations in an Era of Cosmetic Surgery,” Ph.D. diss., Boston College, 2007.

6. Parker-Pope, Tara, “A Decade of Boosting Breast Size,” New York Times, March 21, 2011. Retrieved at http://well.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/03/21/a-decade-of-boosting-breast-size/.

——————

Related Content:

Hollywood Now Seeks Authenticity

Ironing Out the Wrinkles of Wanting Plastic Surgery

You’re So Perfect…Except For Your Boobs

Sweet Revenge?

Is ‘Bo-Tax’ Unfair to Women Who Want Their Looks to Compete?

Terrifying Trend: Models and Mini-Liposuction

Huffington Post: Former Miss Argentina Dies From Cosmetic Butt Surgery

Using Cosmetic Surgery Stop Bullying?

 

Post to Twitter

Older Leading Ladies and the Evolution of Hollywood

Photograph by: Handout, Disney via the Montreal Gazette
Meryl Streep

Copyright Matt Sayles - Associated Press

Between 2003 and 2009, the number of roles for older women in film and on television more than doubled. Rebecca Keegan of the Los Angeles Times wrote:

According to the Screen Actors Guild, in 2003 women older than 40 accounted for 11 percent of the female film and TV roles (excluding reality shows); by 2009 that number was up to 28 percent. There’s still a gender gap when it comes to age in Hollywood — men in the over-40 category nabbed 42 percent of the roles last year, but older actresses are gaining ground.

Although 28 percent is far from a majority, we have to celebrate the fact that in the 21st century actresses over 40 years of age are being taken much more seriously. Keegan speculates that there is

a growing awareness in the movie industry of the untapped potential of older audiences, especially female ones. The women who helped drive box-office hits like The Blind Side, The Devil Wears Prada and Sex and the City would rather go out and watch Meryl Streep flirt with Alec Baldwin than stay home and play on their X-Boxes like the young adults that studios so often court.

Meryl Streep, Diane Lane, Demi Moore, Helen Mirren, Halle Berry, Julianne Moore, Naomi Watts, Julia Roberts, and Sandra Bullock are just a few of the women who are chipping away at the glass ceiling in Hollywood. As consumers, we can affect change via our movie choices. Let’s make 2011 the year these leading ladies smash that tired old ceiling altogether.

Read the full story by Rebecca Keegan of the Los Angeles Times here.

Related Content:

View Your Body As If You Were 80

The Old and Tired

Seeing Beauty in All: Over-40 Nudes

Face It! – What Women Really Feel as Their Looks Change, The Book

Huff Post Highlights Beautiful Older Women

Cougars: Unfortunately Coming to a Town Near You

Post to Twitter

Filmmaker Amanda Micheli Defies Categorization

Micheli_profile

By Sharon Haywood

Amanda Micheli

Amanda Micheli

What do a cowgirl, Wonder Woman’s stunt double, and a beauty queen crowned inside a Colombian prison have in common? Filmmaker Amanda Micheli. Since 1996, she has cast women such as these as the unlikely protagonists in her acclaimed documentaries, such as Just for the Ride, Double Dare, and La Corona. Micheli, an award-winning director, producer, and cinematographer isn’t interested in fitting into a particular niche or appealing to a specific audience, but rather the Harvard graduate gravitates to creating films that fall “outside of the box.” According to Micheli, women filmmakers are “pigeon holed.” She elaborates by saying, “We have weepies, movies that make you cry, the touch-feely women’s films. I have nothing against those films but they aren’t the kind of films I make.” No, instead Micheli creates the type of films that we celebrate at Adios Barbie, films that present women in roles you rarely see in mainstream media: Women “who identify themselves through a certain kind of physical presence and courage that goes beyond sexual identity.”

Her latest project is no exception. Micheli branches away from documentaries to explore the world of fiction. She is working on her first screenplay (tentatively titled Tomboy), a coming-of-age story featuring 16-year-old Ruby and her experience as a young rugby player. Micheli is vested in giving the female athlete more screen time, which makes sense considering that the filmmaker also played for the U.S. women’s rugby team. Her screenplay, although not autobiographical, taps into her experiences as a player for the national team and as a coach for Berkley High’s all-girls rugby team. Inspiration for her screenplay in part comes from watching the teen girls grow from playing rugby: “Some never played sports before, had low self-esteem, and didn’t feel a sense of power in the world,” she explains. “Playing rugby opened their eyes to the power in their bodies. You’ve got girls of all shapes and sizes who never thought they could [feel] that joy of taking someone down. It is not a typically female experience. It’s not about violence. There’s a very positive outlet for aggression in contact sports that men have enjoyed for centuries.”

She describes Ruby as “a real life female action figure” who Micheli has cast as a shorter girl. “In the rugby world there’s a specific position that’s meant for smaller people,” she explains. “It’s incredibly rare to have that kind of diversity. In a lot of sports you tend more toward uniform body shapes. In rugby … gaining weight, body fat is okay.” Tomboy not only looks at body-image issues but it will also potentially tackle themes of identity, such as homophobia, and racism as it relates to the Samoan community in San Francisco. Although her first draft is complete, the filmmaker admits, “I’m struggling as a writer to create her true image. I want Ruby to figure out who she is.” One thing Micheli knows for sure is that Ruby “does not fit a cookie-cutter image.” The same can be said of Micheli’s eclectic documentaries.

Jeannie Epper and Lynda Carter

Jeannie Epper and Lynda Carter

Her first production, Just for the Ride (1996) received a Student Academy Award and features two fearless female rodeo champions, 76-year-old Fern Sawyer and 51-year-old Jan Youren. Micheli’s exploration of women in professional rodeo questions traditional perceptions of women and has been touted as a film that rails against sexism and ageism. Her second film, Double Dare (2004) stars two stuntwomen: Jeannie Epper and Zoë Bell. Epper donned the real muscles behind the 1970s Wonder Woman, and Bell shouldered the heavy lifting for Lucy Lawless as Xena the Warrior Princess and Uma Thurman in Tarantino’s Kill Bill. The documentary has earned praise as a film that smashes gender stereotypes but what Micheli loves about this film is that it reveals the “real people behind the iconic images.” Her next documentary, the Academy Award nominated La Corona (2008) co-directed with Isabel Vega, chronicles the experience of four inmates in a beauty pageant set inside Bogotá Women’s Prison. The character-driven film challenged her own beliefs about beauty pageants: “I thought it would be easier to criticize or deconstruct these women’s involvement in the beauty pageant but when I got in the prison I recognized that were so passionate about it … and it was hard to take an ideological stance.”

Fans of Micheli’s work have tried to categorize her both personally and professionally, but she resists classification. Both Just for the Ride and Double Dare have received an overwhelming positive response from the LGBT community, which has led folks to label her as a gay filmmaker. For the record, Micheli who is in a long-term relationship with a man states:

“I certainly don’t identify as a straight woman, but I don’t identify one way or another. I take the more intellectual point of view that sexual identity is sort of limiting … I think that gender identity is much broader than sexual identity.”

In terms of the women in her films she says: “I haven’t set out to make films about women of any certain sexual identity. Just for the Ride is about two female cowgirls who identify as straight but they’re kind of butch. That’s one thing I love about these women is that they defy categorization.” And that’s exactly what we love about Micheli and her work.

Read more about Micheli and her various other projects at her website www.runawayfilms.com

Post to Twitter

Beauty Comes in All Cup Sizes

Photo of Kiera Knightly from CollegeCandy.com

 

Photo of Kiera Knightly from CollegeCandy.com

Photo of Kiera Knightly from CollegeCandy.com

By Valerie Kusler

CollegeCandy.com recently launched a weekly series in which they post a set of photos celebrating celebrity body traits that may not be considered ideal by mainstream Hollywood standards — and we love the idea! Although we wouldn’t necessarily use the term “flaws” as this article does (albeit in quotation marks, they know these traits are not really flaws), we applaud their efforts to show that “the beautiful people” also have unique and quirky traits that contribute to, rather than detract from, their beauty.

In this first edition, CollegeCandy highlights A-cup actresses, such as Kristen Bell, Natalie Portman, Keira Knightley, and Cameron Diaz. You can almost guarantee that all of these women have been pressured at some point during their careers to consider breast augmentation, but they felt confident in the beauty of their natural bodies. We’re sure glad they did.

See all the photos at CollegeCandy.com.

Celebrating Celebrity ‘Flaws’: Flat and Fabulous at CollegeCandy.com on May 13, 2010

Post to Twitter

‘Sex and the City’ and Body Image

SATC2-karaoke
SATC2-karaoke

Photo from scene in SATC2, Warner Brothers

By Valerie Kusler

With the recent release of second ‘Sex and the City’ movie, the Web is abuzz with commentary on everything from the poorly Photoshopped movie poster to longtime fans coming to the defense of the movie that has been largely trashed by critics. The sequel’s release has also fostered new discussions on what the popular franchise — and its colorful characters — stand for, and how it has affected its millions of dedicated viewers over the years.

A recent article by Leslie Goldman of iVillage has sparked our interest. Goldman brings to light a less common perspective: How the ladies from ‘Sex and the City’ actually helped her become more accepting of her body. She provides a few specific examples in her article where Carrie, Samantha, Miranda, and Charlotte have taken turns helping each other remember the beauty of their own bodies. Of course, you can find 100 other articles arguing that these actresses fall exactly in line with the Hollywood thin ideal and are not at all representative of the bodies of average middle-aged women — and it’s certainly true. The actresses in ‘Sex and the City’ are not body image role models, but here at Adios Barbie, we like to examine both sides of the issue, and we appreciate Goldman’s refreshing point of view. After all, most of us still have days where body confidence is a struggle. Carrie and company are a welcome reminder that we all have the power to be that encouraging voice to our friends, helping them realize — as Charlotte did when she told an anxious Carrie that she could wear a paper sack and still be the most fabulous woman at the party — that we are all beautiful and deserve to feel that way.

Read the full article at iVillage and let us know what you think. Despite the images and valid arguments to the contrary, has ‘Sex and the City’ ever made you feel more confident in your skin?

Related content:

Annoying Trend: Celebs Play Dumb About Body Image

Michael Jackson: Another Victim of the Fame Game

Lady Gaga’s “Born This Way”: Racist or Revolutionary?

Gabby Sidibe in Bazaar: Curvy in Couture

Body image gets animated: What The Simpsons and Family Guy say about beauty

Music’s New Bold and Bountiful

The Truth About Celebrity Weight Loss

Margaret Cho on Drop Dead Diva and the Power of Reclaiming Beauty

Three Cheers for Kate!

Post to Twitter

Hollywood Now Seeks Authenticity

Photo by Matthew Richardson, The NY Times

A Little Too Ready for Her Close-Up? by Laura M. Holson at The New York Times

Photo by Matthew Richardson, The NY Times

 

It took years for Hollywood to create the perfect woman. Now it wants the old one back.

In small but significant numbers, filmmakers and casting executives are beginning to re-examine Hollywood’s attitude toward breast implants, Botox, collagen-injected lips and all manner of plastic surgery.

Television executives at Fox Broadcasting, for example, say they have begun recruiting more natural looking actors from Australia and Britain because the amply endowed, freakishly young-looking crowd that shows up for auditions in Los Angeles suffers from too much sameness.

“I think everyone either looks like a drag queen or a stripper,” said Marcia Shulman, who oversees casting for Fox’s scripted shows.

Independent casting directors like Mindy Marin, who worked on the Jason Reitman film “Up in the Air,” are urging talent agents to discourage clients from having surgery, particularly older celebrities who, she contends, are losing jobs because their skin is either too taut or swollen with filler. Said Ms. Marin: “What I want to see is real.”

Even extras get the once-over. Sande Alessi, who helped cast the “Pirates of the Caribbean” movies, said she offers to photograph actresses in their bathing suits, telling them they can keep the photo for their audition books.

Professional courtesy? Not exactly. Moviemakers prefer actresses with natural breasts for costume dramas and period films. So much so that when the Walt Disney Company recently advertised for extras for the new “Pirates” film, the casting call specified that only women with real breasts need apply. By taking a photograph, Ms. Alessi said, “we don’t have to ask, we will know.”

The move toward “less is more” is being propelled by a series of colliding social and technological trends, more than a dozen film and television professionals said.

Cosmetic enhancements remain popular, with 10 million surgical and nonsurgical procedures performed in the United States in 2009, according to the American Society for Aesthetic Plastic Surgery. At the same time, the spread of high-definition television – as well as a curious public’s trained eye – has made it easier to spot a celebrity’s badly stitched hairline or botched eyelid lift.

Read the full story at The NY Times

Related Content:

Plastic Wrap – Turning Against Cosmetic Surgery

You’re So Perfect…Except For Your Boobs

Sweet Revenge?

Ironing Out the Wrinkles of Wanting Plastic Surgery

Is ‘Bo-Tax’ Unfair to Women Who Want Their Looks to Compete?

Terrifying Trend: Models and Mini-Liposuction

Huffington Post: Former Miss Argentina Dies From Cosmetic Butt Surgery

Using Cosmetic Surgery Stop Bullying?

 

 

Post to Twitter

Vanity Fair’s Lack of Color

VANITY-FAIR-HOLLYWOOD-ISSUE

VANITY-FAIR-HOLLYWOOD-ISSUEFor Vanity Fair, the future is all white by Hannah Pool, The Guardian

Does anything strike you as odd about this latest ­Vanity Fair cover spread? Yes, it’s their 16th annual ­”Hollywood Issue”, shot as usual by Annie Leibovitz, and ­intending to herald the bright young things of Tinseltown, just in time for this year’s Oscars. A row of elegantly coiffed pretty young things gaze out from the gatefold, draped on the lawn, showing just the right amount of powdered skin, styled to look just the right side of “available” (yet not too threatening). But look again, isn’t something missing? Granted, there are no men on the cover, but let’s ­assume that’s ­intentional. No, what I’m talking about is the ­complete lack of melanin. Read more: The Guardian

Post to Twitter

Jennifer Jonassen: A Sizeless Star

Photo credit: www.amycrilly.com
Photo credit: www.amycrilly.com

Photo credit: www.amycrilly.com

By Sharon Haywood

“It’s important for me to portray being fat as beautiful,” said Jennifer Jonassen, a 40-year-old up-and-coming plus-sized actress, dancer, and writer intent on breaking sizeism barriers in Hollywood. Originally from Brooklyn, New York she worked in various off-Broadway shows from the age of 18 to well into her thirties. With the exception of one stage role, she exclusively played mothers. It was only when she moved to Los Angeles and broke into film that she was cast in a wider variety of roles. She stated, “I finally was able to be portrayed as beautiful.”

It hasn’t been easy. Via her regular column at PLUS Model Magazine she shares her frustrations at the excess of demeaning roles for fat actors in Hollywood. Although she admits that she could work more, she will not compromise herself. In 2007, Jonassen was hired to play the lead in a film shot in San Francisco. Upfront and transparent, she clearly stated her conditions: “I do not want to be a fat joke and I won’t do any scenes depicting binge eating in a comical way.” Somehow the production company didn’t hear her. The script demanded she break a scale by stepping on it, as well as provide comic relief by overeating. Without ever shooting a scene, Jonassen chose to fly back to LA. The experience, though difficult, crystallized her path. She explained,

“I realized then, having that experience, that it’s more important to portray being fat as something different than what it’s been. I have since turned down roles by HBO and Fox. There were projects where I could have been easily cast but they were always demeaning, always ugly.”

Her award-winning monologue in Girlie Show (2000), created by Lori Lamb and Susan Greenhill, was far from ugly. Her monologue, Manifesto 275, not only described her weight at the time, but more importantly, how she makes no apologies for it. Recent projects include a recreation of a Twilight Zone episode, directed by Jim Pasternak in which she portrays a classic 1930s Hollywood leading lady, and an upcoming guest segment on the web-based series, Squatters. One current undertaking she is particularly proud of is the documentary Fat, due for release later this year: “It was an amazing experience. The director Julian Dahl and the producer Linnea Dahl are very supportive. It’s going to be a powerful, powerful film. It shows very different, idiosyncratic stories of different perspectives of what it’s like to be fat or feel fat. Fat is so stigmatized in our society that it’s time to reclaim it.”

Her role in Fat not only includes a nude scene, but also documents the first time she performed with her dance troupe R.A.I.D. (Random Acts of Irreverent Dance) – in a full-body gold spandex suit. (To get an idea of the troupe’s caliber, some of the dancers have worked with Madonna and Rihanna.) In September 2008, Jonassen began her dance career at “38 years old and three hundred and forty some-odd pounds.” She explained how the creator and choreographer of R.A.I.D., Ramie Becker, aims “to have everyone incorporated into dance. She wants different shapes and sizes, and ages and levels of dance because she sees there is a real stigma in the dance world. She wants to expand that world so that everyone is included.” Jonassen recounted how coming to the decision to wear the spandex suit challenged her. “I really deliberated for weeks. Will people think it’s offensive? Or will it be, she’s fat and it’s funny?” Ultimately, she is grateful for the inner transformation it triggered. In fact, she asserts that everyone should slide into a gold spandex body suit at least once. In her opinion, “you can’t hate yourself in it.” Today, Jonassen celebrates her body.

In her debut article for PLUS Model Magazine, she wrote,

“I am a plus-size actress who is trying to change the way larger women are thought of and portrayed on film and onstage, as well as the world that they live in.”

Determined to realize her goal, she’s decided to create her own opportunities. In conjunction with Becker, she is developing “a one-woman burlesque show a la Mae West” to be performed in LA later this year. She also envisions creating a series of one-woman shows that could incorporate other themes – trapeze or maybe even rock climbing – all in the name of bashing stereotypes. And she’s not stopping there. She is also co-authoring a script that features her ideal role: “A leading lady with no mention of weight.” Based on her accomplishments, courage, and unwavering resolve, Jonassen’s vision for both herself and Hollywood is well within reach.

Discover more about Jennifer Jonassen at her website, her Facebook page or at PLUS Model magazine.

Related content:

If You’re Fat, Your Paycheck Might Not Be

Lagerfeld Sets Aside Fat Phobia for Renn

Carrie Fisher Joins the Ongoing Star War Against Fat

Why Being Fat Is–and Isn’t–All That

Size and Sardine Packed Southwest Airlines

NYTimes Writer Barely Apologizes for her Discriminatory Remarks Against Fat People

Weight Stigma: Breaking it Down with Advocate and Activist Marilyn Wann

 

Post to Twitter

Jessica Simpson’s Controversial Curves

By Chris Gordon, WireImage

 

By Ophira Edut

Today’s understatement: I’m not a huge Jessica Simpson fan. Her singing is insipid, her “dad-ager” creeps me out, and she seems totally dependent on men for self-esteem. But I have to say, big courage to her for flaunting a figure that looks more like the average American woman’s than I’ve seen on any Hollywood celeb in decades.

At a Chili Cookoff in Florida, a noticeably heavier J-Simp exercised her “right to bare arms” by flaunting her fleshier bod in a tank top and an (admittedly unflattering) pair of high-waisted jeans. Naturally, this set off a firestorm of media attention, conveniently landing her on the cover of People magazine.

Publicity stunt or not, if this puts a little more meat on some Tinseltown booties, then let Jessica set a trend that spreads faster than her “Tuna or chicken?” bit. Perhaps we could live to see Jennifer Aniston eat a carb again, or Madonna show a little less arm tendon.

Sister Ashlee spoke out in Jessica’s defense, telling People, “How can we expect teenage girls to love and respect themselves in an environment where we criticize a size 2 figure?” It’s great that she took a stand. However, I can’t help but remember Ashlee’s own nose job, which came after years of this same anti-glamour talk. Even Ashlee fell prey to the same media machine that she rails against.

Hey, that’s reality. If it was so easy to ignore powerful media images, we’d all be walking around proudly flaunting “muffin tops” or flat chests or whatever. Still, I dig the idea of Tony Romo lovin’ up a more padded Jessica Simpson. Hearing about a Hollywood icon being adored after weight gain, rather than jilted for a supermodel, makes me happy.

Of course, I wouldn’t be surprised if Joe Simpson orchestrates the next phase of her career and has her peddling the Jessica Simpson diet and fitness plan. You know, to go along with the hair extensions, body lotions, shoes and handbags. A girl can never have to many jobs, I guess. But I’m secretly hoping there are a few more bowls of chili in her future first.

Post to Twitter