Regenerating Hymens and Bloody Sheets: What’s Really Going On Down There?

HymenFilm

By Therese Shechter

A still from a 1947 sex ed film that says hymens have nothing to do with virginity

A few months ago at a dinner party, the topic of hymens came up (don’t all your dinner parties go like this?) and how on rare occasions the membrane is completely sealed and has to be surgically opened. One of the men there wondered how the condition could go unnoticed, seeing as it would block the passage of urine. It took me a while to realize that he thought women urinated from the opening that leads to the vagina. This from a twice-married father of 3 in his 60s.

Being female doesn’t guarantee we know the score either. We grow up with so many myths and get so little useful information about the female anatomy. Is it surprising that what we know about the hymen–its anatomy, its history, and its relationship to a woman’s sexual history–is flawed, incomplete, and yet totally ingrained in our collective consciousness?

For example, friends often tell me they didn’t bleed the first time they had intercourse because gymnastics or horseback riding broke their hymens. In fact, the bonk of a balance beam tends to get absorbed quite well by the vulva. Heather Corinna of Scarleteen points out that it’s more likely that, in the past, the threat of a broken hymen was used to discourage women from doing just these kinds physical activities.

As for me, during a long sexual dry spell, I’ve joked that my hymen must be growing back. Guess what? This can actually happen. In “Virgin: The Untouched History,” author Hanne Blank tells the story of a Taiwanese woman who had no less than three hymenotomies to unseal a relentlessly regenerating hymen. Even a sex ed film from 1947 tells us the hymen has nothing do with virginity, so why have the myths persisted?

Let’s take a journey into the misunderstood world of hymens and see what’s really going on down there.

The hymen is an inconsequential little bit of tissue: Or as Hanne Blank describes it: “A hymen is what’s left over when you make a hole.” The hymen can be thick or thin. It can change shape, grow, shrink, or disappear over time. It can have one hole, several holes or have no hole at all (this is the imperforate hymen, which gets noticed at puberty because it blocks the flow of menstrual blood). When penetrated, some women bleed a lot and some don’t at all–and that blood can come from any irritation on the vulva or vagina. It can happen the first time you have sex as well as the 23rd. Most importantly, hymens tell as accurate a story about a woman’s sexual history as the tip of a man’s penis tells about his. That is, no story at all.

There’s more than one useless way to check a woman’s virginity: Checking a woman’s hymen may be the gold standard these days, but it’s just one of a long line of attempts to prove the unprovable. Many ‘virginity tests’ were based on the idea that intercourse opened a channel between a woman’s vulva and throat. So, using this obvious faulty logic, the woman in question might be asked to smell a head of lettuce to see if it would cause urination. Or, she’d be seated on a cauldron to see if its smoke could be smelled on her breath. Yet another test used string to measure the ratio of a woman’s head to her throat (this one makes a fun party trick, see below for a link to a bonus video).

The hymen wasn’t even discovered until 1544: It started when the anatomist Andreas Vesalius went looking for a reason as to why some women bled during intercourse. He isolated a bit of tissue in two female cadavers he was studying, and because one was a nun and the other a hunchback, he decided neither had had intercourse with a man. The presence of this tissue sealed the deal, so to speak. Many other men followed his path of discovery and the magical hymen went from being a tiny anatomical body to the ne plus ultra of female virginity. You see, men really wanted and needed a medicalized definition of female virginity, one that smacked of scientific accuracy, as opposed to all those bits of string and lettuce leaves.

It all sounds ludicrous, but so were the tests to find witches and look where that got us. Lest you think present-day ‘virginity testing’ only happens in far-away countries where women are veiled, my own Manhattan gynecologist has told me stories of mothers bringing their daughters in to her to be verified as virgins. (She patiently explains to them the only way to know is by asking). And just a couple of months ago, a guy posted Facebook photos of what he claimed were his bloody honeymoon sheets, boasting to the world that his wife was a virgin. People were outraged, but I think mostly because they thought that all that lady blood looked gross.

There is a giant re-virginizing marketplace: Given the pressure on women to ‘perform virginity loss’ to the specifications of the misinformed masses, there is much money to be made selling products that recreate signs of virginity that have nothing whatsoever to do with virginity. Here’s my own consumer rundown:

Creams like China Shrink Cream, Liquid Virgin, and Like a Virgin are applied to the vaginal walls in order to (allegedly) cause swelling and tighten the vagina. For under $10 they promise to make it feel, you know, like the very first time. One also claims to be an excellent disinfectant and deodorant. We asked an intern to try it on her lips but nothing happened.

The ‘artificial hymen’ is actually a small piece of plastic embedded with red dye that’s inserted into the vagina before sex. It sells for about $30 online and those in the know recommend the Japanese brand over the Chinese because it won’t cause as many infections. Despite ordering the Japanese model for myself, I couldn’t convince my husband to try it out. It sounds like a joke but in 2010, Egyptian clerics demanded that anyone caught using one of these rather icky devices should be put to death by the state.

More hymen myths and some of the revirginizing products on the market.

At the most drastic end of the spectrum are the different varieties of hymen reconstruction. Many women, even those who have never had intercourse, go to clinics all over the world, including the US, to get a stitch or two put into their labia (the hymen is usually too fragile). This is to ensure bleeding on wedding-night penetration. Hymen reconstruction is a common practice in Europe, the Middle East, and South America, but carries a real stigma for doctors and very few actually admit to doing it. In contrast, US clinics advertise hymen reconstruction all over the internet, right alongside ‘vaginal rejuvenation’ surgery.

As for me, I never bled my first time, and I know it wasn’t because of gymnastics, which I did my best to avoid. I think the event was just so anti-climatic, my hymen remained as unmoved as the rest of me.

Bonus video link: Watch Hanne Blank demonstrate the string virginity test on Therese Shechter.

* * *

Therese Shechter is a filmmaker in the final stages of the new documentary “How to Lose Your Virginity.” You can join the conversation right now by answering the question “what’s the biggest myth about virginity you ever learned?” and by submitting your own virginity story to the crowd-sourced First Person project.

Donate today to support the final edit of “How to Lose Virginity.” You can watch the new trailer here. Therese’s first documentary “I Was A Teenage Feminist” is probably showing at a Women’s Studies class near you. You can follow her @trixiefilms.

 

Post to Twitter

Obama’s Plan B Move Gets an F From Us

Plan-B

By Ashley-Michelle Papon

Once again, stunned women found themselves to be the sacrificial lambs to the slaughter after the shocking decision by the Obama administration to restrict the sale of the morning-after pill to minors in the U.S., overriding an earlier recommendation by the Food and Drug Administration to increase access. Although Kathleen Sebelius, Secretary of Health and Human Services officially made the decision, Obama’s reasoning as to why he didn’t interfere called attention to his own role as father to two young daughters.

Around the blogosphere, outraged progressives are citing the inherent paternalism underpinning the President’s decision as largely motivated by reelection politics. “What should have been a routine decision based on sound scientific and medical evidence just got hijacked by politics – again,” Jessica Arons, director of the Women’s Health and Rights Program at American Progress, writes in a guest blog for ThinkProgress.

And the decision isn’t a particularly astute one, as Scott Lemieux correctly asserts over at The American Prospect, characterizing the decision as “a disgrace” inconsistent with what attracts voters to the Democratic party in the first place. “It’s awful on the merits, and politically involves attacking a core constituency of the Democratic Party for no obvious benefit,” he writes. “Overriding professional FDA scientists in order to advance an agenda hostile to reproductive freedom and the equality of women is not what most Democrats believed they were voting for.”

No, this is certainly not the hope that scores of previously ignored young constituents had voted in, but it’s understandable why Obama erroneously believe such a decision is the perfect vehicle with which to mobilize the undecided-but-leaning-conservative vote in the months building up to the grand finale of Obama’s reelection campaign push.

Like so many other issues in the status quo that are hotly debated over the scape of women’s bodies, this one is grounded in paternalism, the idea that parents have a right to know that not only are their progeny (aw, who are we kidding—their daughters) are having sex, but if they get pregnant as a result.

Irin Carmon expands on this idea, arguing that teen sex has always occupied a sacred place in the Conservative anti-woman agenda because early strategists recognized what a powerful voting bloc parents could be when faced with the unacceptable reality that their daughters can and will have sex. This awareness is amplified whenever national headlines circulate putting young women’s sexuality front and center, even if reports of such behavior are largely exaggerated, if they exist at all (see: rainbow parties) and played out again just days after the Plan B debacle, when ABC News ran with a completely bogus, overblown story that risky group sex is increasing among teens.

It’s worth noting that the way we conceptualize young women having sex is problematic. Although more optimistic critics might insist the goal of the administration is to encourage young women to talk to their parents about sex, it’s worth pointing out that the administrative focus continues to be on “10-year-old girls.” It’s a subtle, but revealing move, as 10-year-old girls cannot emotionally or legally consent to sex in the first place; they can, however, continue to purchase other over-the-counter medications with even more severe side effects than those known to be associated with Plan B. Ultimately, this move is a counterproductive one, leaving young women with fewer reasons to disclose their sexual activity to their parents.

Taken a step further, it’s a decisive move to question Plan B’s necessity. When Obama vocalized his support for Sebelius’ decision, he did so by arguing that Plan B should not be purchasable “alongside bubblegum or batteries,” not only conjuring up an image of a female form that cannot have sex but subtly sending the message that Plan B (much like the sexuality of women as a whole) is nothing more than an unnecessary impulse purchase.

But there’s nothing unnecessary about accessing contraception. Actual figures are hard to pin down, but some experts estimate that up to 47 percent of all unplanned pregnancies involve no contraception. Although Texas is so far the only state to openly declare “a war on birth control,” the country as a whole has taken a gigantic step back, defunding programs and slashing budgets designed to increase access to pregnancy and communicable-disease prevention. Obama also cautioned stunned White House Press Corp reporters that it’s important to “use common sense” with regards to what is dispensed over-the-counter. But given that Plan B is most effective when administered 72 hours of sexual intercourse, it’s a head scratcher to figure out how requiring a prescription is acting with common sense of any kind, even in a meta-political sense.

The administration’s double-cross might be temporarily appeasing to Conservatives hell-bent on controlling the sex lives of their daughters, but it’s a Pyrrhic victory. By preventing young women from emergency contraception, the administration is most certainly going to facilitate an increase in abortions, particularly among women who belong to communities of color, who are less likely to have access to medical care to obtain a prescription for Plan B in the first place.

Make no mistake: with their decision to keep Plan B stocked behind the pharmacists’ counter, the administration is absolutely limiting access to Plan B for all women, regardless of their age. Women over 17 will not have to produce a prescription, but they will have to prove their age, subjecting them to a major invasion of privacy that barely passes muster for anything other than backdoor slut-shaming in order to obtain emergency contraception.

Especially with the growing support of “pharmacists’ conscience rights,” legal jargon which allows pharmacists to refuse to fill prescriptions based on their individual moral code. Though most states which support “conscience rights” require pharmacists to offer referrals to other places where those in need can access it, not all do, potentially creating a labyrinth of retail bureaucracy and time-delays undermining a woman’s reproductive autonomy.

Obama would do well to remember that the groups being most decisively impacted by this decision make up the key demographics that elected him three years ago (interestingly, just a year after Plan B first became widely available in the United States) and have a long history of being stepped on. When the line between Democrat and Republican begins to blur in this fashion so that we’re oppressed and devalued regardless of which way the wind blows, we lose a lot of the impetus to stay where we are.

Post to Twitter

Dare to Resolve to Ditch Dieting

Official logo for the Ditching Dieting campaign.

Dieting is toxic to your health.

By Sharon Haywood

Aside from bikini season, late December and early January is the other time of year that we’re especially susceptible to feeling bad about our bodies. Special thanks to the media and the diet industry for ensuring we do by reminding us that we overindulged during the end-of-year festivities and we must resolve to lose (at least) that holiday weight come the new year. Weight Watchers in the UK is making certain you hear that message loud and clear. On January 1, 2012 almost all the major UK television networks will simultaneously air a three-minute Weight Watchers commercial aka music video worth over US$23 million. In it, Weight Watchers proudly parades 180 clients, mostly women, who have lost a total of 5908 pounds using its trademarked ProPoints program launched just a year ago.

What I’d like to see is how many of those slimmed-down success stories will have kept the weight off by New Year’s Day 2016. According to the studies, within four to five years most of them will have regained the weight, and at least 60 to 120 of them will weigh more than their pre-diet weight. Yes, I said diet. Regardless of what Weight Watchers (or SlimFast or Jenny Craig or any other system or product designed to lose weight) calls it, a diet is a diet. And diets don’t work. Sure, if you eat only protein and avoid carbs or measure your portions or adhere to a system of points that limits your caloric intake, yes, you will lose weight… initially. But research[1] clearly shows that any weight lost is sure to creep back within five years.

Researchers at California’s UCLA sought out specific evidence on the long-term results of dieting by analyzing every published diet study—31 in total[2]—that monitored participants’ weight from two to five years after their initial weight loss. The study’s lead author, Traci Mann, summarized their results:

“You can initially lose 5 to 10 percent of your weight on any number of diets, but then the weight comes back. We found that the majority of people regained all the weight, plus more. Sustained weight loss was found only in a small minority of participants, while complete weight regain was found in the majority. Diets do not lead to sustained weight loss or health benefits for the majority of people.”

You may have already heard this information but you may have very well just resigned yourself to playing the losing and gaining game. It’s understandable considering how barraged we are with the message that fat will kill you. But the truth is fat can actually protect you against certain diseases including osteoporosis, chronic bronchitis, and some cancers.[3] Furthermore, the evidence strongly supports that continued yo-yo dieting or losing and gaining weight repetitively does real damage to your body, not to mention the mental and emotional self-abuse that dieting demands. The research is clear: weight cycling plays a large role in various ailments, ironically often attributed to obesity: high-blood pressure, congestive heart failure, diabetes, and even premature death.[4] Unfortunately, the studies that attract the most press are those that support weight loss as a means to health; such studies are substantially funded by the pharmaceutical[5] and weight loss industries. And these industries are certainly not lacking in profits; in only two more years, the worldwide weight-loss market is predicted to be worth a staggering US$586.3 billion.

It’s time to say “No” to big business making money off our bodies. Enough of believing the propaganda that fat is the enemy. Enough of trusting that the label ‘overweight’ or even ‘obese’ obtained from an unsound BMI chart translates to ill health. As the year comes to a close and you compile your list of New Year’s resolutions, dare to do something different. Dare to listen to your body. Dare to ditch dieting. And know that you don’t have to do it alone. Across the pond, the Endangered Bodies campaign, launched by the Endangered Species International March 2011 Summit, is in full swing. The Endangered Bodies (EB) team in the UK[6], led by Susie Orbach, launched its Ditching Dieting campaign last month at UK Feminista’s national conference where they invited attendees to “speak out against the misery caused by the diet industry.” And you can, too.

Anyone, anywhere can hold a SpeakOut in the name of Ditching Dieting. You can organize a few friends around your kitchen table or you might fill an auditorium. The point is to create a safe space where the suffering caused by dieting can be expressed and validated. A SpeakOut and the subsequent support group that can emerge from it offer similar peer support that diet clubs such as Weight Watchers provide; however, instead of focusing on working against your body’s natural impulses, a SpeakOut club facilitates strong bonds as you explore collaboratively with other members how to truly take care of yourself. In the words of the UK EB team:

“In general, the aim is to become really aware of where dieting puts you, and to start making important choices about how much you want to play along with a game that is making you miserable… It is about taking on the challenge to accept and understand how natural it is to eat happily, in response to your hunger, and without guilt.”

Learning how to eat intuitively is a process that takes time, especially if you’ve historically relied on external factors, such as a meal plan or a point system to guide you on when and how to eat. Diets teach us to ignore our internal cues, which only contributes to eating disorders and obesity. As Susie Orbach has asked many times,

“If dieting worked, why would we need to do it more than once?”

Let’s kick off the New Year off by Ditching Dieting and move toward eating “happily ever after.”

* * *

Whether you’re in the UK, the US, Canada, or Europe, consider hosting your own SpeakOut. For more information visit www.ditchingdieting.org and write to info@any-body.org to obtain a SpeakOut package.

Currently in the UK, a Body Image Inquiry is underway looking into the causes and consequences of body image anxiety. If you’re based in London, take the day off work on January 16, 2012 and join the UK EB team in speaking out against the diet industry at Parliament. Full event details here.


[1] Gina Kolata, Rethinking Thin, New York: Picador, 2007, 188.

[2] Contrast that with the fact that the obesity “crisis” was primarily borne out of four studies. See Paul Campos’ The Obesity Myth, New York: Penguin Group (USA) Inc., 2004, pages 13-20 for more details.

[3] Linda Bacon, Health at Every Size, Dallas: BenBella Books, Inc., 2008, 138-139.

[4] Paul Campos, The Obesity Myth, New York: Penguin Group (USA) Inc., 2004, 32-33.

Post to Twitter

Eating Disorders and LGBT: What’s the Connection?

Actress Portia de Rossi, shown here with wife, Ellen DeGeneres, struggled with near-fatal anorexia, which she attributed in large part to keeping her true sexuality a secret for so long. Photo credit YourCelebrityStuff.com

Actress Portia de Rossi, shown here with wife Ellen DeGeneres, struggled with near-fatal anorexia, which she attributed in large part to keeping her true sexuality a secret. Photo credit YourCelebrityStuff.com

By Valerie Kusler

October is LGBT history month, and as the resident eating disorders geek here at Adios Barbie (perhaps I’ll upgrade myself to “specialist” after I finish my MSW), it got me thinking about how little I know about the connection between eating disorders and LGBT population. The default assumptions I’ve heard are that eating disorders (EDs) are more common in gay males than straight males due to increased pressure to be thin and attractive in the gay community, while lesbians have fewer eating disorders than straight women, since they apparently eschew our society’s narrow beauty standards. How much truth, if any, is behind these stereotypical assumptions? Is there a connection or correlation between sexual orientation/gender identity and eating disorders? 

I recently attended the NEDA (National Eating Disorders Association) Conference in Los Angeles and I was delighted to discover a session about exploring the interconnections between sexual orientation and eating disorders, given by Courtney Long (MSW, LC, CHt) of Phoenix, Arizona. Courtney shared that her own personal experience with EDs began in her early teens. She had a lot of the risk factors already such as a controlling mother with rigid rules, black-and-white thinking, perfectionism, and suppression of emotions in the family. Around the same time, she had a brief sexual encounter with a female that left her confused and doubting herself for years, always feeling like there was something wrong with her that she couldn’t quite put her finger on. She began exercising compulsively, cutting, restricting her food, and her ED behaviors got more and more serious.

Fast forward to adulthood, and one day, Courtney met a woman and fell madly in love. At that point, coming out didn’t feel like a choice. She knew couldn’t hide her love. Thankfully, her family was very accepting. By accepting her own sexuality and having the support of her family and friends, Courtney then felt she was able to examine her ED behaviors and seek treatment. “I had somehow convinced myself that salad tasted good without dressing,” she joked. “I love ranch dressing, and today I eat it whenever I want.” Now, Courtney is a Life Coach, Hypnotherapist, author, speaker, and more, all to spread the gospel of self-care, authenticity, fluidity, and acceptance.

Courtney’s success story is uplifting, but it’s not always the norm. In an environment that’s not always supportive and accepting, people in sexual minority groups often face additional pressures and challenges that lead to increased self-doubt, shame, and depression. LGBT adolescents are especially at-risk, as they often struggle with accepting their identity, coming out, and fitting in with peers who can be downright cruel. In Courtney’s situation, coming out helped her face and get treatment for her ED, but in other cases, coming out could be so stressful (especially when friends and/or family are not supportive) that it could actually intensify ED symptoms. Does authenticity lead to recovery or is it so painful that it can make existing conditions even worse? Courtney says there’s not much research out there on the topic; based on her experience, some LGBT folks see these factors as related, while others don’t.

So, what about those prevalent assumptions that gay men suffer from EDs much more than straight guys and lesbian women are more “immune” to EDs than heterosexual women? Researchers would say that both of those assumptions stem from a sociocultural perspective. For gay men, sociocultural suggestions state that the values and norms in the gay community place a heightened focus on physical appearance, and that by aiming to attract other men, they are subject to similar pressures and demands as heterosexual women (bodies as sexual objects, and thus, increased body dissatisfaction.) Although the sociocultural perspective is only part of the picture, it turns out that homosexual and bisexual men do in fact have significantly increased prevalence of EDs and ED behaviors including increased dieting, greater fear of gaining weight, lower body satisfaction, and dysfunctional beliefs about the importance of body shape (Kaminski, Chapman, Haynes & Own, 2005.) One recent study found that 6% of gay or bisexual males met the criteria for an eating disorder, compared to 1% of heterosexual males (Feldman & Meyer, 2007).

The sociocultural explanation for EDs does not hold up as well when it comes to lesbian and bisexual women. The suggestion is that these women do not share the same standards of feminine beauty espoused by western culture that straight women do, and thus, will be less likely to subscribe to the thin ideal and supporting behaviors. In fact, some studies have found lower levels of body dissatisfaction than heterosexual women; however, other studies have shown conflicting results, either finding no difference between heterosexual and lesbian/bisexual women among ED symptoms, or even higher levels of EDs (specifically, binge eating disorder) in lesbians compared with straight women. So what gives? This idea that lesbians are immune to EDs just because they supposedly eschew the Barbie beauty standard doesn’t seem to fit, especially when you consider that social is only one-third of “biopsychosocial,” the buzz-phrase in the mental health field for explaining the complex causes behind eating disorders. Sure enough, Feldman and Meyer’s study (one of the most recent and methodologically sound studies on this subject) found that the prevalence of EDs among lesbians and bisexual women is comparable to heterosexual women.  Although the sociocultural factors associated with being a sexual minority can increase risk factors for EDs (as with gay and bisexual men), the positive aspects may not be enough to actually decrease risk factors substantially (as we see here with bisexual/lesbian women.)

As for transgender individuals, they often feel tremendous body dissatisfaction. As Courtney put it, “There is so much body dissatisfaction in our society today anyway. Just imagine if you also felt like you were born into completely the wrong body.” Not surprisingly, there is a dearth of research on EDs among transgender individuals, a population lacking in research overall. One attendee in Courtney’s session mentioned that brand new research has found that transgender people with EDs who go through transition recover from their ED based solely on the transition. So, when the body dissatisfaction subsides, the ED tends to go away. An intriguing idea, but I have yet to see the published study so I’m on the lookout for it. To the contrary, another session attendee, who frequently worked with homeless transgender teens and young adults at a center in New York City, stated that she often saw male-to-female transgender people develop EDs as they were transitioning because they felt the need to be delicate, feminine, skinny, and small. Also, being young and uneducated, many of them felt like the only work they could get was sex work, so “passing” was a big deal. They perceived that “passing” as female was the only way to be attractive as a sex worker, the only way to get the money to pay for gender reassignment surgery, so if “passing” meant extreme weight loss, it was a risk they felt they had to take.

At the end of the day, research on eating disorders among people who identify as LGBT is still insufficient and conflicting. However, based on the research we do have, it’s clear that some segments of the LGBT population face increased risk factors for eating disorders and body dissatisfaction. Thus, it is important for mental health practitioners, medical professionals, parents, and educators not to buy in to the assumptions that lesbian and bisexual women are less vulnerable to eating disorders than straight women, or that just because EDs are more common in gay men that they never affect straight men. Although some people unfortunately still discriminate on the basis of sexuality or gender identity, eating disorders do not.

Read the complete study from Feldman & Meyer

For more information about Courtney Long and to learn about her upcoming memoir, Authentic and Free: A Journey from Shame to Self-Acceptance, visit her website.

Related Content:

Transgender History Makers

Body image and transgender folks

Transgender Beauty in India

NOW’s Love Your Body Campaign And NOH8 Join Forces To Promote Acceptance For All

Gay/Trans dance crew, Vogue Evolution, brings it to ‘America’s best dance crew’

Gays on TV: Despite Growth, Real Portrayals More Urgent Than Ever

 

 

Post to Twitter

How Diets Decrease Your Self-Esteem and Not Your Size!

scalefierce

Dieting and Body Image: The Facts

By Maddie Ruud from hubpages.com

Raking in $40 billion every year, the diet industry is one of the most profitable areas of our economy today. One out of three women and one out of four men are on a diet at any given time. With these statistics, you well may wonder why the so-called “Obesity Epidemic,” has not yet subsided. Surely, with such a wide consumer base and high profit margin, diets must be helping somebody… But what those before and after pictures don’t show you is the other side of the coin. Of all their customers, two thirds of dieters regain the weight within one year and virtually all regain it within five years.

So? No harm done, you say. They’re back where they started, minus a few dollars (or hundreds, or thousands…). Unfortunately, it doesn’t stop there. Dieting has actually been shown to be counterproductive, taking a toll on both your self-esteem, and your body. Food deprivation slows your metabolism, making it harder to lose weight in the future, and easier to put it back on, plus some. The average weight change per diet today is not to lose weight, or even break even, but to gain seven pounds. And failing, time and again, does nothing for your confidence in yourself.

Perhaps you’re still not convinced. You have more discipline than the rest. You want it bad enough. I do not doubt your determination, or your desire. After all, two out of five women and one out of five men would trade three to five years of their life to achieve their weight goals.

However, the diet industry, like most others, is dependent on repeat customers, on bringing back your business.

You are set up to fail, simply to afford the opportunity to re-enroll you, and make another few bucks off of your misery.

New Study Proves Dieting Ineffective

A two-year study at UC Davis highlighted the difference your attitude can make in losing weight. The participants, all obese, were divided into two groups for monitoring: dieting and non-dieting.

The dieting group was told to moderately restrict their food consumption, maintain food diaries and monitor their weight. They were provided with information on the benefits of exercise, on behavioral strategies for successful dieting, and on how to count calories and fat content, read food labels and shop for appropriate foods.

The non-dieting participants were instructed to let go of restrictive eating habits, and pay more attention to their internal cues, both physical and emotional, such as hunger, satiety, anxiety, sadness, and anger. Instead of diet propaganda, they were given information on healthy nutrition, and participated in a weekly support group focused on addressing the particular concerns of the obese person in an intolerant society.

The Results

Almost half of the dieting group dropped out before finishing the treatments, while 92% of the non-dieting group completed the program. While the non-dieters did not lose any significant amount of weight, they experienced numerous health benefits that the dieters did not: lowered bad cholesterol levels and systolic blood pressure, quadrupled their physical activity, and felt significantly better about themselves and less depressed at the end of the two-year period.

Yes, you say, but the dieters lost the weight. Not so. While the members of the dieting group lost 5.2% of their initial weight in the first 24 weeks of the study, by the end of the program, they had regained nearly all of it. That first boost of self-confidence due to the rapid weight loss deteriorated as the pounds piled back on, leaving participants with lower self-esteem than when they had started.

“We have been ingrained to think that seriously large people can only make improvements in their health if they diet and slim down,” said nutrition researcher Linda Bacon, who conducted the study along with Judith Stern, a UC Davis professor of nutrition and internal medicine. “But this study tells us that you can make significant improvements in both metabolic and psychological health without ever stepping on the scales or counting calories. You can relax about food and eat what you want.” Now, wouldn’t that be nice?

Read more by Maddie Ruud on hubpages.com

Related Content:

Girls and Dieting: Then and Now

Scale Back: It’s International No Diet Day!

Three Steps to Transform the National Weight Debate

Post to Twitter

Expressing Disorder: Art Therapies for Eating Disorder Treatment

A still image from "Expressing Disorder"

A still image from the documentary "Expressing Disorder"

By Valerie Kusler

Several years ago, David Alvarado learned that the woman he had recently fallen in love with was severely bulimic. Never having been exposed to eating disorders (EDs) at a personal level, questions swirled around his head, but answers were elusive. The more David read about EDs, the more he wanted to understand the deep, painful emotions underlying the destructive attitudes and behaviors of EDs. As a filmmaker, he decided that the best way for him to do so was to make it his next project.

As he began researching and speaking with experts in the ED field, David came across discussions about expressive art therapy and immediately gravitated toward this style of treatment for a number of reasons:

“Art therapies are a highly visual approach to treating eating disorders, which made them ideal for a medium like film,” he explains. “I was also drawn to how engaging this type of therapy is. In art school, they teach you that art is first and foremost a way of eliciting an emotional reaction from your audience. So, if you can spill you emotions out on the page and make someone else feel how you felt, then it seems to me that this is an excellent way to connect with other people and feel that you’ve been heard.”

After a successful fundraising event in which Dallas-area artists contributed pieces for a silent auction, David began to plan for filming. However, when he found out he got accepted to Stanford’s MFA program in Documentary Film and Video Production, he made the decision to put the project on the back burner. Over the next three years during and after his graduate program, David filmed in art therapy ED treatment programs in north Texas, Florida, New York, and Colorado. He has filmed variations including drama therapies, movement and photo therapies, and traditional visual art therapies. Today, the filming is complete, and David is now focused on raising additional funds to pay for a post-production team.

A self-proclaimed neophyte to the field of eating disorders, David assembled an Advisory Board of seasoned ED therapists and experts to counsel him throughout the process of filming. His goal with “Expressing Disorder” was to make a film that would be a message of hope and healing to those suffering from EDs, and a vehicle to showcase art therapies and how powerful they can be for the journey of recovery. “There are numerous books and films out there about eating disorders, but many of them are sensational and go for shock value,” he says. “The way they tell the story focuses on the disorder, not the individuals, and they can be very damaging for people actually suffering from eating disorders themselves because they can be very triggering.” For David, it was important to create a film that would be healthy to watch for people currently struggling with EDs, and help – rather than hinder – their recovery process. As someone who has been in successful recovery from an ED for several years, I am grateful to see a film like this being made. It is a much-needed breath of fresh air and will be a valuable asset for those struggling to find hope in their recovery, as well as a message to professionals to see the potential of multidimensional, eclectic treatment.

Anorexia nervosa was named in a recent study as the most fatal psychiatric disorder, with bulimia and other eating disorders also increasing risk of death. With illnesses that are so serious and also highly secretive, finding a way to film enough footage of therapy sessions was no easy task. “The brave women who participated in the film stepped forward for this project because they recognized it as a way to help other people who might be struggling with similar issues,” David said.  He also knew he needed to ensure that the filming process was in no means counterproductive to the recovery of any participants. The therapists he worked with would contact former clients who had been in recovery a significant length of time and ask them to come back for the filming. “We used the filming process to revisit their therapy, but it was not compromising because these individuals are already in a sustaining phase of recovery from their disorder.”

Body image is typically a major component of an ED, though the root issues go much deeper than just food and weight. So, whether a person has negative body image or a full-on eating disorder, David believes art therapy is a powerful vehicle for raising awareness of the problems buried beneath these surface manifestations. From his perspective, art therapies can help a person uncover and face the underlying issues in a way they may not have been able to in the past.

“Art is such an important tool for communication, especially for emotions, so it is the perfect tool for facilitation of a meaningful conversation about those problems,” he said. “When you add in the element of a professional therapist along with those artistic mediums, pinpointing underlying or subconscious concerns becomes more possible.”

At Adios Barbie, we believe it’s important to discuss diversity (or lack thereof) in the media, and this issue is especially poignant regarding EDs. There is an antiquated popular perception that EDs are a “rich white girl” thing. Although this belief is increasingly recognized as outdated, the fact is that many individuals in ED treatment programs do fit the profile of white, female, and at least middle class. However, it is important to distinguish between the prevalence of EDs and formal ED treatment. Only one in 10 people with an ED receive treatment, and only 35% of that group gets treatment in a specialized facility. Thus, those in treatment centers do not come close to representing all those suffering from an ED — and most professionals now acknowledge that EDs do, in fact, affect everyone. A survey by Essence Magazine reported that African American women were at risk and suffer from EDs in at least the same proportion as white women. Additionally, in some cases, cultural attitudes can impact whether a person suffering from an ED seeks treatment. According to the Renfrew Center, EDs are one of the most common psychological problems facing young women in Japan; yet, many people go undiagnosed due to the shame in seeking treatment.

David concurs that cultural norms and expectations could certainly be one of the reasons he did not see diversity in the programs he visited. “Taking my family as an example, I can’t imagine any of my Mexican family members seeking professional help about body image issues. In that culture, the more common path is to seek out healing in your church and amongst your family.” Additionally, socioeconomic status come into play to some degree as well, as many ED treatment programs are enormously expensive, leading many to face their struggle without professional help if they do not think they can afford treatment. [1] With regard to men, since about 90% of people suffering from EDs are female, it’s also not shocking that David did not come across men in the programs.

Moreover, David explains that making an encyclopedic, comprehensive documentary about EDs was not his goal in creating the film.

“I wanted to showcase the impact these amazing therapies can have on individuals with eating disorders, and I felt it would be unnecessary and detrimental to the project to get bogged down in too many details or explanations,” he said. “There are already numerous resources out there for learning the basics about EDs, such as understanding the various types of disorders, warning signs, and who is affected. This film has a very specific focus and was made for specific reasons: First, I wanted to create a film that illustrated that eating disorders are not about food. They’re about something much deeper, and this film helps dispel that popular myth. Second, there has never before been a documentary that shows such a wide array of art therapies; and finally, most popular media today about eating disorders is unhealthy to watch for people who have eating disorders themselves.”

As for David’s favorite type of therapy he encountered, drama therapy takes the cake (though I’ll come right out and confess, anything involving masks gives me the heebie-jeebies.) “It is amazing to see the women acting out their ED, personifying it for the first time. I thought I understood how intense the experience of EDs were based on my discussions and research, but after seeing people externalize and speak to their EDs like that – I truly realized how severely they loathed their own bodies in a way I could not have understood before.”

During the next 15 days, David is attempting to reach his fundraising goal of $25,000 for a post-production team for “Expressing Disorder,” which would include an editor, colorist, audio mixer, educational programs for outreach, and DVD production. A former film student myself, I can tell you that all of these things are necessary for creating a quality film with the production value a project like this deserves.

Watch the film’s teaser here:

To learn about how you can contribute, visit http://www.indiegogo.com/EDdoc.

For more information about David Alvorado and this project, visit the website for “Expressing Disorder” at http://arttherapydoc.com/.

 


[1] Although cost for comprehensive treatment can indeed be prohibitive, there are therapists and ED programs that work on a sliding scale or are flexible with payment; contact the National Eating Disorders Association for information about programs and professionals in your area.

 

Related content:

EDNOS: The Eating Disorder You Haven’t Heard Of

Discrimination and EDNOS: One Woman’s Story

Celebrating Eating Disorder Recovery: Inaugural NEDA Walk in Texas

Study: Black Girls 50% More Likely to be Bulimic than Whites

Multicultural Women & Body Image

You Don’t Have to Have an Eating Disorder to be Image Obsessed

Post to Twitter

Michelle Obama’s “My Plate” Leaves Us Hungry

Picture 3

by Ophira Edut

Lights, camera, action! It’s…oh. It’s my middle school pamphlet on the five basic food groups, right? Wait, no, it’s my Weight Watchers tracker where I can enter what I just ate into an online widget. Cool! What? It’s not that? Oh, oh, now I see: it’s the First Lady’s big healthy eating initiative, ChooseMyPlate.gov, which was unveiled June 2nd. It’s shaped like a plate! With primary colors! And fruit and meat on the same dish! It’s the answer to that confusing food pyramid, they say. So why does this feel like more of a respin than a revolution?

Listen, I love the Obamas. I love Michelle O and her regal stature, her power arms and cool shift dresses that fuse 1940s housewife chic with corporate goddess toughness. I like that she’s made healthy lifestyles and exercise her pet cause, because this country needs it. We just happen to need it in a bigger, more attention-grabbing way than this underwhelming launch, if you ask me.

ChooseMyPlate.gov looks exactly like you’d expect something with the suffix “dot-gov” to appear. It’s super-basic, all-purpose (it even uses the term “general population”), and devoid of personality. The design is “meh” and some of the fonts render in a jagged way, like it was all dropped into one of those free web templates.

Buh-bye, Food Pyramid.

MyPlate is the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s update to their 1992 Food Pyramid, which listed “Meat and Beans” rather than Proteins and “Milk” instead of Dairy. The updated plate graphic is a little easier to understand and apply. I imagine it being best suited to kids (perfect elementary school “health unit” fodder) or to people who have very little education on nutritious eating, cooking and self-care. Maybe it can also help those few souls living under rocks who still think a Big Mac is a complete meal because it has meat, grains, dairy and vegetables  (add a strawberry sundae for the fruit–bam!).

Here’s what I like about the site, and what I think could be improved. Nobody asked, but it’s America and this whole deal is being marketed as mildly patriotic (fight obesity! maintain our first-world nation status!)–so I’m gonna exercise a little free speech. Here goes.

 

What’s Good:

* Decent calculators & basic nutrition info.
The tools, though light, work. There’s a thorough encyclopedia of nutrition basics here that’s good to find all in one place. However, when I clicked on the Food Planner link in the Interactive Tools section, it took me to the MyPyramid Menu Planner, which is totally confusing. I thought we were done with the pyramid and using the plate now, guys. So why is this tool still here?

* Recipes are okay, too.
The recipe suggestions weren’t as generic as I thought they might be. Yes, there were all-American staples like pizza, lasagna and French toast. But kudos for listing a quinoa dish with slivered almonds and a spinach salad I might just make for lunch after I finish writing this. Knock off ten points for the recipes coming as a PDF, rather than as web text that can be pasted into an email, viewed on an iPad, or forwarded to that relative back home who eats Duncan Hines frosting straight from the tub (oh wait, that’s me).

Some personalization/customization.
You can enter your age, sex, weight, height and activity level to get a very basic plan for how much of each food group to eat to either a) maintain your current weight, or b) “gradually move toward a healthier weight” (props for using this body-friendly language). I was told to eat 7 ounces of grains, 3 cups of vegetables, 2 cups of fruit, 3 cups of dairy and 6 ounces of protein. I have to tell you, I have never in my life measured a grain, much less in ounces. Have you? What does an ounce of grain look like? Give it to me in slices, pasta handfuls, something I can eyeball, and I’ll be much more likely to do it. Honestly, Weight Watchers is light years ahead at recrafting the USDA guidelines into something real people can apply to our lives.

Room for Improvement:

* Um, social media, anyone?
Nary a Facebook or Twitter icon could be found on this site, except for a Tweet button that led me to a dead Twitter link. What if I wanted to share an article or tidbit? Send a shout-out? Follow them for new information? Nope.

* How about some video? Some real people and case studies?
Let’s get away from the government-issued vibe, shall we? This could be easily done by including a community element, letting people share their journeys and support each other. As much as we dislike The Biggest Loser, it still touches us because we identify with a real person sharing emotions and struggles. That’s why Weight Watchers or OA meetings work. Speaking of people, where’s Michelle Obama on this site? I’d like to see a warm welcome video on the front page with the first lady addressing me directly, firing me up about the whole mission of this. Michelle, save your modesty for your J. Crew wardrobe, por favor!

* Give the everyday person a call to action.
What can the average person do with all this scientific information about whole grains and whatnot? You can become a national strategic partner if you run an organization/company and want to help disseminate the new guidelines. Neato. But what about the average person who wants to get excited about implementing healthy eating in his/her life, and could use some encouragement? What about lonely folks who might band together if there was a community element here, even a Facebook page? This needs to be made into a glamorous cause, like Obama’s Let’s Move initiative. For goodness’ sake, if we can do that for illness (pink ribbon icons, commemorative stamps, national walks and celebrity endorsers), how hard can it be to do it for health? It’s so American: we make tragedy sexy and prevention frumpy. Hire a PR firm and get some slick PSAs, quick!

* I’d be overweight at 140 pounds? Nuh-uh.
I’m 5’2″ and packing some “baby weight” after giving birth last October. So when I entered my current weight of 165, I got a message telling me that I was over the healthy weight for my height range, which could put me at risk for certain diseases. Fair enough (and in further fairness, the site states that breastfeeding moms follow other guidelines). However, I wanted to see how low the USDA expected me to go. I kept getting this warning message until I hit 135, a weight that makes me look scary-skinny. I last saw 135 while I was eating mega-controlled portions of microwaved Jenny Craig, not exactly a sustainable lifestyle for me, nor one I want to pursue. Ever again.

I know, I know…it’s  easy to be an armchair revolutionary and critic, and I’ve done that. But this is tough love, Madame Obama, because we want you to succeed. So, let’s grab some sprouted grain bread and trans-fat-free oils, and hop into 2011. In a world of WordPress plugins and widgets, a Tip of the Day box does not an interactive revolution make. Today’s tip advises me to keep frozen and canned-in-water fruit in stock. I just kept thinking, “Haven’t we all read this a million times in Good Housekeeping or Glamour or O magazine? Isn’t there a way to present basic information to the masses without dumbing it down and packaging it in behind-the-times design? So please, USDA and Mrs. Obama, give people a little more credit. Give us some meat–er, protein–to grab onto. Here’s hoping that version 2.0 feels more alive and interactive. I’m still hungry.

Post to Twitter

Body of Lies: Debunking the BMI

antique scale

By Ashley-Michelle Papon

It’s that time of year again: swimming pools are opening, students are jogging, and if you’re a mom, you’re probably getting fat. According to a new study released in Pediatrics, the official journal of the American Academy of Pediatrics, young mothers are more likely to make poor dietary decisions, less likely to exercise, and have a higher Body Mass Index, most commonly known as the BMI.

The United States has a firm history of economically punishing teenage mothers by denying them access to better resources including healthier food. Still, the most troubling pretext of the article has little to do with the gender disparity or economics skewed to keep the poor poor, but the implication that the BMI of young mothers is an indication of just how unhealthy they are.

Though the BMI has long been touted by medical and athletic communities as the greatest tool of measurement to determine someone’s health, stricter academic scrutiny and authentic scientific study is finding that the BMI as a gauge of health is flawed. Contrary to what you have probably heard several times over, the BMI is not an accurate indicator of how “overweight” you are. And it’s certainly not a viable indicator of your health.

In July of 2009, Keith Devlin of the National Public Radio shared with the world 10 reasons why the BMI is bogus. Urging listeners and readers to take the BMI—and their next meal—with a grain of salt, he patiently explained that, at its core, the BMI was a nonsensical, physiologically inaccurate formula created by mathematician Lambert Adolphe Jacques Quetelet in the early 19th century. Quetelet’s method to create a measurement was calculated by dividing one’s weight in kilograms by the square of their height in meters.

Although it may seem scientifically sound at first blush, the methodology creates no distinction between the weight of muscle versus the weight of fat, despite the fact that fat takes up roughly four times the space of muscle. In other words, there can be quite a difference in your weight and size based on your body type. By failing to evaluate the two body features separately, the BMI delivers faulty results that make being classified as overweight a virtual certainty. And though BMI has some level of success with whole groups of people, its use to determine how healthy one adult can be is questionable at best.

But the biggest weakness with BMI would have to be how it attempts to lock people into rigidly defined categories for underweight, ideal, overweight, and obese. The scale, ranging from 1 to 100, becomes overweight at 25 and obese at 30; it is transfixed in such a way to suggest that when individuals reach 25 or above, they’ve crossed into the territory of being unhealthy. This conclusion begs the question of what unhealthy actually looks like. By relying solely on the BMI for the numeric answer to this question, the aesthetics often don’t bear out to compliment the BMI’s ranking.

And although people think they can eye it the way they can parallel parking, a true visual assessment of one’s physique isn’t something that can be winged. In one of her earliest criticisms of the BMI, blogger Kate Harding launched a photo project showcasing woman with their height, weight, BMI, and a commentary about the accuracy of the BMI’s rating. One volunteer, Laurie, 5’0 and 130 pounds, carries a BMI of 25.4 percent. According to the BMI, Laurie is “overweight,” despite being a size 4. For emphasis, Harding showcases several curvier women, warning viewers not to get too attached because the BMI’s validation that they’re unhealthy suggests they will drop dead of heart attacks and diabetes soon.

Harding’s point was drastic, but the photographs of everyday women unable to meet these unrealistic body standards hammer home the damage done by the promotion of outdated rubrics employed to shame our bodies. What was pioneered in the interest of helping advance medicine has become a modern tool of extremely organized bio-power. The cultural and social obsession with weight management for women has always gone hand-in-hand with the desire to render them less powerful. In a very real sense, the physical reduction of their size is a stripping down of their agency. Since Kevin Smith gave up directing movies and became a factivist following his ejection from a Southwest flight for being “too fat,” this schism has widened to keep persons of size from inheriting power, often out of concern for their health.

Except that that brings us back, full circle, to why the BMI is completely bogus. The BMI is billed in a way that if someone has a BMI that places them in the “overweight” range, they are immediately considered unhealthy. Yet new research is finding that heavier people actually have more protection against a number of illnesses and chronic conditions, from kidney failure to infectious diseases and lung issues.

Despite this, it’s not going to stop the diet industry from using the BMI to keep pushing their products. Social attitudes notwithstanding, sources like the International Obesity Task Force and the American Obesity Association are treated as completely legitimate entities when they use the BMI to explain how we, as a society, are doomed because of our size. Despite authoring the majority of the World Health Organization’s obesity reports, both organizations are primarily funded by pharmaceutical and weight loss companies. Is it any wonder that these folks (and others associated with them) have been aggressively campaigning to have obesity classified as a disease? As Paul McAleer over at BigFatFacts concludes, “The ‘obesity epidemic’ is worth billions to the pharmaceutical, diet, weight loss, media, and government agencies fueling it.”

This should leave every person asking themselves: do I want to keep banking my health on a tool designed to tell me my body is flawed so that the companies employing that tool can continue creating a billion-dollar industry?

Related content:

If You’re Fat, Your Paycheck Might Not Be

 

 

Post to Twitter

EDNOS: The Eating Disorder You Haven’t Heard Of

pills-and-measuring-tape

pills-and-measuring-tapeBy Michelle Cantrell of VenusVision.com

When I received the diagnosis of Eating Disorder Not Otherwise Specified (EDNOS) two years ago, I had mixed reactions. On the one hand, the label didn’t seem to fit. Me? With an eating disorder? I wasn’t underweight, and in fact was technically on the edge of being “overweight.” I had intentionally thrown up from time to time, but certainly was not bulimic. I had tried starving myself periodically in an attempt to get my weight under control, but I definitely wasn’t anorexic. At the most I considered myself a chronic dieter, or someone who at times could be a little obsessed with healthy eating and exercise. I could agree that my eating was very disordered but to identify myself as someone with an eating disorder made me squirm in my seat a bit. (For more on the differences between disorders and disordered eating, read Disordered Eating or Eating Disorder?).

On the other hand, after hearing my therapist tell me I had an eating disorder, I felt relief. After all, I was there to get help, and if I could label my problem, perhaps the solution would come more easily. I was ready to silence the voice in my head that made me obsess over my body and food 24 hours, a day 7 days a week, and if giving that voice the name ED (for Eating Disorder) would help, I was willing to accept it.

National Eating Disorder Awareness Week is February 20-26 in 2011, which is a good opportunity to bring attention to this lesser known sibling of anorexia and bulimia. Everyone knows about anorexia and bulimia, but EDNOS, which has only recently begun to receive recognition in the mental health community can be as equally dangerous and life consuming as its better known counterparts.

So what does eating disorder not otherwise specified mean? Well, the short answer is a “category [of] disorders of eating that do not meet the criteria of a specific eating disorder,” according to the most recently updated version of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-IV). Ultimately, the definition is more anecdotal, which explains why it is often harder to identify; however, according to the publication Eating Disorders: The Journal of Treatment and Prevention, 50% of individuals who present for eating disorder treatment receive the diagnosis of EDNOS, which affects 4 to 6% of the general population.[1]

Although many of the criteria for EDNOS may closely mimic anorexia or bulimia, some behaviors are less obvious, and in fact, within our diet- and body-obsessed culture, can appear perfectly normal. What may look to an outsider as just another diet involving close monitoring of caloric intake and exercise may in fact become — if not already — an unhealthy and unnatural way to control weight based on an intense drive to be thin combined with an unrealistic body image. On the flip side, EDNOS also includes the sub-category of Binge Eating Disorder (BED), which is often overlooked as a simple lack of willpower. Regardless of where a patient lies in the spectrum of EDNOS, it is important to realize that the emotional trauma suffered as a result of the disorder is equal to that of anorexia and bulimia, and should not be seen as anything less than a serious illness.

The introduction of EDNOS as an accepted diagnosis “gives a voice to sufferers who don’t fit into the narrow diagnostic categories of anorexia, bulimia, and binge eating disorder” said Shannon Cutts, author of ANA: How to Outsmart Your Eating Disorder and Take Your Life Back, and founder of Mentor Connect, a community of people in recovery from eating and related disorders.

Cutts, who herself suffered from anorexia, bulimia, and EDNOS feels grateful for the recognition of EDNOS, and encourages sufferers to seek help:

“If you know that your symptoms, thoughts, and behaviors are affecting your quality of life, then you both need and deserve help. Use your voice and ask for help. Do not assume you are the only one who ‘doesn’t fit’ into a category and therefore you don’t deserve help. There are many people who suffer from EDNOS and you help not just yourself but everyone who suffers from it when you demand the care you deserve. Search out a medical professional who is familiar with eating disorders rather than struggling to educate an unsympathetic doctor or therapist. Be your own health care advocate. You know better than anyone else when you are struggling and need help. Eating disorders kill, and just because your symptoms don’t fall into the three most commonly-recognized categories does not mean they are not equally deadly.”

The health complications that arise from eating disorders are extensive, and include low blood pressure, slower heart rate, a decrease in bone density, a disruption in hormones that sometimes leads to infertility, and more. Even more alarming is the fact that eating disorders have the highest rate of death among any mental disorder — just one episode of bingeing and purging can cause an electrolyte imbalance that may lead to sudden death. That is why it is so important to recognize that eating disorders come in all shapes and sizes and present themselves in a variety of ways.

Is there treatment for EDNOS? Though whole rehabilitation centers have risen to address the problems specific to anorexia, bulimia, and even BED, there is help for other non-specified eating disorders. The effort to overcome any eating disorder is extensive and should not be downplayed. Most of the times, the help of a mental health professional is necessary, and the journey through recovery is never quick and painless. But when you consider the alternative of living a life plagued by self loathing, fear of food, and serious health risks, the effort is one that must be undertaken to break free and live a full and happy life.

As for my own journey, to be honest, it’s an ongoing process. Sometimes it’s two steps forward, one step back. But as Jenni Schaefer, author of Life Without Ed and Goodbye Ed, Hello Me likes to say, “fall down seven times, stand up eight.”

Michelle owns and operates VenusVision.com, which encourages women to be the best they can be. She has written for US Airways and I Am Modern magazines. Michelle is working on her first novel, which follows the yo-yo dieting and mommy adventures of a suburban housewife. She lives in northern Virginia with her husband, two daughters, a Lab, and a ball python. When not writing or enjoying family time, she enjoys travel, good food, and wine.

Additional Resources:

Remuda Ranch

The Renfrew Center

EatingDisordersOnline.com

Related content:

Discrimination and EDNOS: One Woman’s Story

Expressing Disorder: Art Therapies for Eating Disorder Treatment

Celebrating Eating Disorder Recovery: Inaugural NEDA Walk in Texas

Study: Black Girls 50% More Likely to be Bulimic than Whites

Multicultural Women & Body Image

You Don’t Have to Have an Eating Disorder to be Image Obsessed


[1] Cited from the web site Disordered Eating.

 

Post to Twitter

Body Image: Are We Wired for Distortion?

Picasso_Girl in the Mirror
"Girl in the Mirror" by Pablo Picasso

"Girl in the Mirror" by Pablo Picasso

By Ashley Solomon of Nourishing the Soul

Do you ever wonder why you can’t seem to move past those disparaging thoughts about your hips or belly? Your weight may be less to blame than your brain, according to recent research on body image.

While body image admittedly has many sources of influence (such as parental commentary and the media, to name a few), scientists have discovered that there may be biological bases for distortions of our actual body shape and size. These misrepresentations are characteristic of those with eating disorders (and in fact are part of the diagnostic criteria), but are also a struggle for those of us who, say, live on Planet Earth… Thus, this new understanding of how we perceive ourselves is particularly relevant.

First, let’s establish how our brains perceive our bodies. Obviously it’s important for our brains to understand both where our bodies are in space (called proprioception) and our relative size in order to make judgments related to movement. For example, we need this information to decide if we can squeeze behind the chair of that jerk who is clearly not moving his seat for us… Or how hard we can plop down on the couch without scaring the cat. People with extremely distorted body image have an extremely difficult time with these seemingly simple decisions.

Research tells us that these individuals’ difficulties may actually be related to brains that are functioning differently. Perceptions of our body size require a fairly complex process that’s completed by the posterior parietal cortex (there will NOT be a test!). Neurologist Henrik Ehrsson actually conducted a study in which he created the illusion of a shrinking waist (No, you can longer sign up to be a participant in the study!) utilizing the Pinocchio Illusion. What he found was that not everyone experienced the shrinking sensation in the same way or to the same degree. This indicated to Ehrsson that our brains might all be slightly different in how we calculate our own size, an important factor in considering what might be contributing to body image issues.

A newer study by one of Ehrsson’s colleagues at the University College London, Matthew Longo, also delved into the roots of body perception. Longo and his buddies asked participants to estimate the location of their knuckles and fingertips while their hands were hidden under a board.  They found that the participants misjudged their hands, thinking that their hands were wider and their fingers were shorter than they actually were, despite being able to pick their hands out of a “line-up” of photographs. Longo called the distortions “dramatic” and explained that visual image of ourselves seem not to be used for position or feeling sense.

To take this a step further, a severely underweight boy could thus look in the mirror, and despite the visual cue, “feel” much larger than he physically is. People of average or greater-than-average weight can also have a distorted body image, calling their bodies “fat” when others fail to see the basis for their criticisms. Thanks to researchers (and their willing participants), we are starting to develop a more scientific understanding for why. And once we have a richer understanding, we may be able to develop new ways to address our negative body feelings.

What ways have you discovered to address your negative body feelings?

This post was originally published at the author’s blog Nourishing the Soul on August 1, 2010. Cross-posted with permission.

Post to Twitter