All-American Muslim: A New Show Unveils Muslim Life in the Midwest

t1larg.allamericanmuslim.courtesy

By Ophira Edut

Hey, non-Arab America, guess what? There are Muslims living in the U.S.A. and some of ‘em are just like us. At least, that’s what TLC’s new reality show All-American Muslim is attempting to portray.

It’s groundbreaking…and it isn’t.

As a Detroit native who grew up a few miles outside of the show’s Dearborn, Michigan setting—a city with the largest Arab population in the United States—I was especially excited to see my hometown make it into reality-land. Simplified or not, it’s high time the media showed a three-dimensional portrait of Arab-Americans, and I’ve set my DVR.

The cameras follow five Muslim families as they navigate between custom and assimilation, and deal with everyday issues like love, family, work and generation gaps. There’s a single Lebanese mom who calls herself a “hillbilly at heart,” marrying an Irish Catholic man who’s converting to Islam. A young mother-to-be, already married at 24, is proud that her husband will break from tradition to be a hands-on dad. There are cops, football coaches, and a sassy blond businesswoman who dresses in short, tight dresses and heels. Some women are veiled (or partly veiled), others are glammed up with blond highlights and heavy makeup. Most of them speak in a flat Midwestern dialect, others with a trace of the Arabic cadence. Hookahs are puffed, prayer rugs unrolled, and daily Muslim life goes on amidst Americana.

While the show has (of course) been criticized by Muslims and non-Muslims alike, I believe it’s a good start. (See one Muslim-American man’s food for thought here.) Obviously, it portrays only a small swath of Muslim life in America: the cast is Midwestern and most, if not all, are Lebanese. The mix of old-school and modern values helps humanize a group that’s been scapegoated more than ever in the last decade since 9/11.

Is it a representation of Muslims worldwide? Well, no. Arabs are only 20% of the total Muslim population. Some of the most concentrated Muslim areas are in Asia and southeast Asia (Bangladesh, Pakistan and Indonesia) and Africa (Senegal, Somalia, Djibouti)—not in the Arab countries. Certainly, a TLC reality program can’t represent the entire spectrum of a religion that boasts over a billion members.

This small cast is not “typical Muslim” any more than Snooki and The Situation are ambassadors for Italian Americans. (What TLC left out is that many of Detroit’s Arab residents are also Christian, notably the Chaldeans from Baghdad and some Lebanese folk.) The show will have stereotypes, conversations that make people uncomfortable, all the pathologies of humanity on display. And if you want to get radical for a sec, a subtext does seems to be a message to whitey that the Muslim next door is just like you. But if it’s gotten people (and the media) talking about Arab-Americans without using the terms “terrorist” and “9/11,” it counts as progress in my book.

I grew up in Detroit during the 1970s and ‘80s, and I witnessed the area’s Arab-American assimilation process as a child. It was a similar path to the one taken by Jews (including my own grandparents, who escaped the Holocaust), and other immigrant groups that have fled to the United States.

In grade school during the late 1970s and early 1980s, Arab kids joined my classes mid-year, some not speaking a word of English. Their multi-generational families piled into homes and their families set up businesses, most visibly “party stores,” print shops, banquet halls, restaurants, and groceries. A slow creep of signs written in both English and Arabic peppered the neighborhood, and the kids started to assimilate, joining Girl Scout troops and sports teams and other extracurricular activities. Still, the process was slow, as many of their families still maintained customs from back home.

Over the years, like many other immigrants, some of our Arab neighbors became part of the nouveau-riche out in the sprawling suburbs, adopting Western beauty ideals and consumerism. Others took the educational track, studying business, medicine, law. Now, a whole first-generation group has grown up in America. Only their parents and grandparents remember the struggles of the old country, though they have faced a different kind of discrimination here. As a group of boys on a Dearborn football team explain on All-American Muslim, their high school is 95% Muslim. When they play rival teams, they’re jeered with Arab slurs. But, they insist, it only makes them work harder.

My father is an Israeli immigrant whose family hails from Jaffa, a city south of Tel Aviv with a mixed Jewish and Arab population. When he moved to Detroit three months before I was born, there were very few Israelis, and that’s remained the case. So, the closest thing to home in some ways has been Detroit’s thriving Arab culture. For 30 years, he’s bought his pita, olives, and Turkish coffee at the Arab-owned stores. Access to my own Middle Eastern heritage came from the comfort of pronouncing hummous with a throaty “ch,” and feeling a geographic and cultural kinship of sorts with my Arab classmates. In a school with few other Jewish kids, my ethnic features were often called out, notably my nose, and when people couldn’t figure out where my name or non-WASPy looks came from, they sometimes assumed I was Arab.

Because I grew up with my own version of cultural dissonance, and witnessed how invisible many cultures were in the media, my activism has centered around representation. In 1992, I co-founded a multicultural women’s magazine called HUES (Hear Us Emerging Sisters). The mission was much like that of All-American Muslim: to be a space where underrepresented groups could tell their own stories and be known.

One of HUES’ most popular articles was called “Veiled,” written by one of the hippest chicks you’ll ever meet—Muslim or not—Maysan Haydar. Maysan is from Michigan, too, and she sports both a tongue piercing and a veil. Back in high school, she would mix a full-body hijab (covering) with silver rollerblades and cheerfully skate through the halls. She’s now married to a Christian man, and, much like the TLC cast, has blazed her own trail while practicing “Islam a la carte.” How very American indeed.

But speaking of veiled, Arab and Muslim culture HAS been shrouded in stereotypes and secrecy here, partly because it hasn’t been revealed in pop culture until now. As troublesome and trashy as reality shows can be, they’re still telling the narratives of our times, giving us a voyeuristic glimpse into lives we wouldn’t otherwise see.

The All-American Muslim series is well-done, in my opinion, and also reveals the multitude of decisions that a bicultural American must make. We get a glimpse of women making choices that aren’t traditionally Western (much like in TLC’s controversial show “Sister Wives”); yet, these choices are shot through with American influence. Some women opt to cover their heads with scarves, but express their style with fashionable and colorful fabrics. Others mix full-length hijab coverings with sexy, strappy heels. The Lebanese-meets-Irish-Catholic wedding features a river dance AND a belly dance, veiled vows followed by a white dress reception, a flashy banquet hall that doesn’t serve alcohol. It’s fascinating to see how people walk the line, which elements of their customs they choose to keep.

These very choices, I believe, are what makes the show “all-American.” The notion of personal freedom is what America, in theory, is all about. And this freedom has left an indelible mark on even the most traditional cast members of All-American Muslim. In one poignant scene, the Irish Catholic mom, a little rattled by her son’s upcoming conversion to Islam, is matter-of-fact. She says she knows that society has to evolve—and that as much as we long for things to stay the same, they don’t.

It’s a truth that All-American Muslim challenges us to embrace. Hopefully, this will just be the beginning of fun, down-to-earth and realistic portrayals of a population that’s long overdue for a serious media makeover. Some of them have only been here for a while. But some have been here all along, as American as the rest of us.

If you’re Muslim, Muslim-American, or watching the show, tell us what you think! Keep the dialogue going, because that’s what it’s all about.

Related Content:

The Hijab: Can it Promote a Healthy Self-Image?

Post to Twitter

Face Value? Study Claims Makeup Makes Women Appear More “Competent”

The NY Times reported on a study of 25 Black, White, and Hispanic women between the ages of 20-50 who were photographed wearing various levels of makeup.

The NY Times reported on a study of 25 Black, White, and Hispanic women between the ages of 20-50 who were photographed wearing various levels of makeup.

By Ophira Edut

Does the mascara make the woman? The New York Times published results of a study (see the article here) claiming that a moderate amount of makeup “increases people’s perceptions of a woman’s likability, her competence and (provided she does not overdo it) her trustworthiness.”

Granted, the study was funded by Proctor and Gamble (which makes me arch a penciled eyebrow), but it was designed by some scholarly folk, too. It’s yet another piece to fall into that uncomfortable realm of human-as-animal/biology-as-destiny that’s such a strange bedfellow with feminism and progressive ideals.

The notion that a woman has to wear makeup to be deemed a solid citizen is about as sophisticated as the old “are you a fall or a spring” palette method. I know plenty of bare-faced ladies who run empires. And trust me, nobody would dare questions their cred. However, I’ve also read studies that the brain can make a lasting first impression within as short as 1/10 of a second. I’m guilty of doing so. And I always get a laugh when people refer to Gloria Steinem as the poster girl for this stereotype of de-gendered feminism. Back in the day, Gloria’s feminist cred was suspect because she was so pretty. Gloria knows the power of being polished, even as she delivers a radical message.

I’ve been swiping on the same five-minute combo of eyeshadow-eyeliner-mascara for about 20 years. I do feel more polished and together with makeup on, though I skip the foundation and blush routine unless it’s a bigger event. I brave the trendy streets of New York makeup-free, too, but usually it’s just to run errands. So I guess along the way, I’ve been socially conditioned, too.

Part of the girlieness I enjoy is getting to play with colors, polishes and powders. It’s fun for the imagination, and harmless to a point. As long as we’re not talking Toddles & Tiaras “glitz” pageants and THAT slippery slope, of course. And thanks to Nirvana, Pete Wentz and the JoBros, boys can dabble in the fun, too. (Guyliner, anyone?)

The danger of such studies, though, is that makeup becomes compulsory, instead of fun.

We can no longer discount neuroscience completely. However, we can’t just take studies like this at, ahem, face value either. Findings like this discount the soul, the essence, the “anime” that we sometimes call inner beauty. Without charisma—which can’t be painted on—all the makeup in the world can only help so much.

Related Content:

Warning: Feminist Wearing Makeup Ahead. Look Both Ways Before Crossing

 

Post to Twitter

Fashion’s Night Out: When Will We Have a Fat-shionable Fall?

F-No, we won't go! Or will we?

F-No, we won't go! Or will we?

By Ophira Edut

Summer’s about over. The red carpets are rolling out (hello, MTV Video Music Awards), which means sucking, tucking and plucking season has begun again. The new fall shows, with a fresh crop of homogenous stars, will be premiering. (Oh, how I’m counting the minutes until Glee’s third season.) New York City, where I live, is gearing up for Fashion Week and the stampede that is Fashion’s Night Out. While I enjoy style and creativity, I admit that my first wry thought was: Fat Girls’ Night In, is more like it. Or maybe Fat-Shun’s Night Out. Hide your kids, hide your wife!

Extreme? Yeah. But I’m issuing a back-to-school rallying cry: will any celebrities step out this fall and represent for the F-word? Not the expletive that got bleeped out of so many VMA acceptance speeches. I mean F-A-T.

Look, I’m not asking for 300 pounds, but that would be awesome. A girl can dream. Gabby Sidibe is available for hire, you producers out there. And I’m not talking about casting for The Biggest Loser, Celebrity Fit Club, or any other fat-bashing show designed to “correct” (read: shame and vilify) people whose size ticks into the double digits. I don’t want to see cameras panning through a weeping fat woman’s apartment as she talks about her out-of-control emotional eating, then is “saved” by some heartless celebrity trainer.

Unless, of course, we level the playing field. Here’s an idea: let’s bring a camera crew into the home of skinny stars secretly wolfing down carbs or binge drinking, smoking, and exercising for hours a day. (Training for a role, my ass. And half my Hebrew School class got nose jobs because of deviated septums, too.) Watch the poor things weep as they forage for cigarette butts in the bushes, or do their third week of a kettle-ball workout and pretend to love it. Perhaps a psychiatrist from the fat acceptance movement can come save this person from the life-threatening dangers of addiction and yo-yo dieting (which can lead to heart attack), or the psychological perils of body dysmorphia. And please, keep those damn calipers away from me, o’ commission-earning trainer stalking the gym floor. The whole BMI measuring system is so out of wack that even Brad Pitt would be considered overweight by its standards. (Seriously? Has anyone else seen Fight Club?)

Nowadays, if I dare say this kind of stuff, I’m accused of a) being a clueless hothead, and b) ignoring the “big O”: obesity. Which may be real, but it’s been co-opted and corrupted by so many money-making industries, that a lot of the hype is pure bull-shizzle.

There. I said it. Slap on my scarlet F (for fat acceptance), please! I hear that red is big on the Fall 2011 runways, speaking of fashion…

Fighting obesity has given us something to do with our money instead of oh, saving it or investing in a sinking stock or housing market. We have an enemy! It has a name! Of course, soda machines don’t belong in schools (duh) and kids could use more exercise. Sure, we should all ride bikes, take hikes and eat fresh produce. But do we all have equal access to these things? Hell no. So let’s shame the poor a little more and blame them for not being able to find a decent piece of fruit for miles, find affordable health care or power-walk safely through crime-riddled neighborhoods. Thumbs up for urban farming and all the eco-friendly efforts that bring health and sustainability to under-served communities. Healthy living without the shaming and judgment, I’m all for.

Then, there’s the simple, unacknowledged truth: food is fun. At my stepdaughter’s upstate New York elementary school, sweets are banned from the cafeteria, even on cupcake-friendly holidays like Valentine’s Day. So now we’re teaching kids that sugar is bad, something to fear and avoid. THAT should keep the candy stores in business on allowance day.

* * *
I’m keeping a scrapbook of celebrities who dare to embrace their non-conforming bods. Much like the stars in Hollywood, it’s perilously thin.

There’s Tyra Banks from a few years ago, who went out in a bikini after putting on some weight. Jennifer Love Hewitt, who always wears bikinis, even when her weight fluctuates and the bloggers publicly stone her with cruel posts. This week, Disney Channel star Demi Lovato scores the F for going “curvy” to the VMAS (whatevs, she’s still tiny) and Tweeting “I’ve gained weight. Get over it. That’s what happens when you get out of treatment for an EATING DISORDER.”

The Kardashians get an honorable mention, though I keep taking them out of the book. Fat that’s distributed to body parts sexualized by mass culture (the Hottentot Venus ass, namely) doesn’t count. There’s no risk involved, otherwise Kim wouldn’t flaunt hers in every bandage dress she can find. Oh, and 50 points off for the QuickTrim sponsorship. Mixed messages are the enemy of healthy body image.

People are visual. Thanks to reality TV, we’re officially desensitized to the surgical fat-sucking and anti-aging procedures that so many millions undergo. So, how about we apply the same treatment to love handles, belly rolls, cellulite, sags and all the body “issues” we’ve declared war upon? Let’s see that being normalized. Because, frankly, that’s what NORMAL looks like. We’ve largely forgotten. With CGI, Photoshop and all the latest digital retouching wonders, our minds are being trained to erase normalcy, SPAM filtering it out into a big global junk file.

Self-acceptance is not defeat. I’ve been saying it for years, and I stand by it. That doesn’t mean you don’t make changes for your health, happiness and well-being. But please, make them from a place of self-love, not shame. And truly question: if you didn’t feel shamed by the culture, would you really make these changes? Look deep. We all want the goodies of acceptance, and social anxiety is not easy to navigate. But the long-term effects of body hatred are worse.

[Author's note: if you're a fashion-loving girl who doesn't fit a size 2, The Curvy Fashionista has listed a handful of Fashion's Night Out events for the plus-size crowd here. But ugh, Lane Bryant is debuting a new line of "slimming jeans" featuring their "exclusive T3 Tighter Tummy Technology." Soooo, invite us to your store so we can spend to look skinnier? Enough already! But the Cupcakes, Curves and Cleavage Event at Viva La Femme in Chicago sounds rad. More, please!]

I do smell the opportunity for a revolution here, though. Fashion’s Night Out COULD be respun as Fat’s Night Out. (Fat being used loosely, to encompass anyone that doesn’t fit the ever-narrowing standard, that is.) If anyone wants to do some impromptu fashion activism, by all means, do! (I’m imagining a picket line chanting “F-no, we won’t go!” But picket lines aren’t all that fashionable anymore.) Whatever your creative version of resistance looks like, go to town. Fashion IS supposedly all about art and free expression, or so they say. So hit the streets with your own Fat-shion’s Night Out parade. Tell them we sent you.

Post to Twitter

Michelle Obama’s “My Plate” Leaves Us Hungry

Picture 3

by Ophira Edut

Lights, camera, action! It’s…oh. It’s my middle school pamphlet on the five basic food groups, right? Wait, no, it’s my Weight Watchers tracker where I can enter what I just ate into an online widget. Cool! What? It’s not that? Oh, oh, now I see: it’s the First Lady’s big healthy eating initiative, ChooseMyPlate.gov, which was unveiled June 2nd. It’s shaped like a plate! With primary colors! And fruit and meat on the same dish! It’s the answer to that confusing food pyramid, they say. So why does this feel like more of a respin than a revolution?

Listen, I love the Obamas. I love Michelle O and her regal stature, her power arms and cool shift dresses that fuse 1940s housewife chic with corporate goddess toughness. I like that she’s made healthy lifestyles and exercise her pet cause, because this country needs it. We just happen to need it in a bigger, more attention-grabbing way than this underwhelming launch, if you ask me.

ChooseMyPlate.gov looks exactly like you’d expect something with the suffix “dot-gov” to appear. It’s super-basic, all-purpose (it even uses the term “general population”), and devoid of personality. The design is “meh” and some of the fonts render in a jagged way, like it was all dropped into one of those free web templates.

Buh-bye, Food Pyramid.

MyPlate is the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s update to their 1992 Food Pyramid, which listed “Meat and Beans” rather than Proteins and “Milk” instead of Dairy. The updated plate graphic is a little easier to understand and apply. I imagine it being best suited to kids (perfect elementary school “health unit” fodder) or to people who have very little education on nutritious eating, cooking and self-care. Maybe it can also help those few souls living under rocks who still think a Big Mac is a complete meal because it has meat, grains, dairy and vegetables  (add a strawberry sundae for the fruit–bam!).

Here’s what I like about the site, and what I think could be improved. Nobody asked, but it’s America and this whole deal is being marketed as mildly patriotic (fight obesity! maintain our first-world nation status!)–so I’m gonna exercise a little free speech. Here goes.

 

What’s Good:

* Decent calculators & basic nutrition info.
The tools, though light, work. There’s a thorough encyclopedia of nutrition basics here that’s good to find all in one place. However, when I clicked on the Food Planner link in the Interactive Tools section, it took me to the MyPyramid Menu Planner, which is totally confusing. I thought we were done with the pyramid and using the plate now, guys. So why is this tool still here?

* Recipes are okay, too.
The recipe suggestions weren’t as generic as I thought they might be. Yes, there were all-American staples like pizza, lasagna and French toast. But kudos for listing a quinoa dish with slivered almonds and a spinach salad I might just make for lunch after I finish writing this. Knock off ten points for the recipes coming as a PDF, rather than as web text that can be pasted into an email, viewed on an iPad, or forwarded to that relative back home who eats Duncan Hines frosting straight from the tub (oh wait, that’s me).

Some personalization/customization.
You can enter your age, sex, weight, height and activity level to get a very basic plan for how much of each food group to eat to either a) maintain your current weight, or b) “gradually move toward a healthier weight” (props for using this body-friendly language). I was told to eat 7 ounces of grains, 3 cups of vegetables, 2 cups of fruit, 3 cups of dairy and 6 ounces of protein. I have to tell you, I have never in my life measured a grain, much less in ounces. Have you? What does an ounce of grain look like? Give it to me in slices, pasta handfuls, something I can eyeball, and I’ll be much more likely to do it. Honestly, Weight Watchers is light years ahead at recrafting the USDA guidelines into something real people can apply to our lives.

Room for Improvement:

* Um, social media, anyone?
Nary a Facebook or Twitter icon could be found on this site, except for a Tweet button that led me to a dead Twitter link. What if I wanted to share an article or tidbit? Send a shout-out? Follow them for new information? Nope.

* How about some video? Some real people and case studies?
Let’s get away from the government-issued vibe, shall we? This could be easily done by including a community element, letting people share their journeys and support each other. As much as we dislike The Biggest Loser, it still touches us because we identify with a real person sharing emotions and struggles. That’s why Weight Watchers or OA meetings work. Speaking of people, where’s Michelle Obama on this site? I’d like to see a warm welcome video on the front page with the first lady addressing me directly, firing me up about the whole mission of this. Michelle, save your modesty for your J. Crew wardrobe, por favor!

* Give the everyday person a call to action.
What can the average person do with all this scientific information about whole grains and whatnot? You can become a national strategic partner if you run an organization/company and want to help disseminate the new guidelines. Neato. But what about the average person who wants to get excited about implementing healthy eating in his/her life, and could use some encouragement? What about lonely folks who might band together if there was a community element here, even a Facebook page? This needs to be made into a glamorous cause, like Obama’s Let’s Move initiative. For goodness’ sake, if we can do that for illness (pink ribbon icons, commemorative stamps, national walks and celebrity endorsers), how hard can it be to do it for health? It’s so American: we make tragedy sexy and prevention frumpy. Hire a PR firm and get some slick PSAs, quick!

* I’d be overweight at 140 pounds? Nuh-uh.
I’m 5’2″ and packing some “baby weight” after giving birth last October. So when I entered my current weight of 165, I got a message telling me that I was over the healthy weight for my height range, which could put me at risk for certain diseases. Fair enough (and in further fairness, the site states that breastfeeding moms follow other guidelines). However, I wanted to see how low the USDA expected me to go. I kept getting this warning message until I hit 135, a weight that makes me look scary-skinny. I last saw 135 while I was eating mega-controlled portions of microwaved Jenny Craig, not exactly a sustainable lifestyle for me, nor one I want to pursue. Ever again.

I know, I know…it’s  easy to be an armchair revolutionary and critic, and I’ve done that. But this is tough love, Madame Obama, because we want you to succeed. So, let’s grab some sprouted grain bread and trans-fat-free oils, and hop into 2011. In a world of WordPress plugins and widgets, a Tip of the Day box does not an interactive revolution make. Today’s tip advises me to keep frozen and canned-in-water fruit in stock. I just kept thinking, “Haven’t we all read this a million times in Good Housekeeping or Glamour or O magazine? Isn’t there a way to present basic information to the masses without dumbing it down and packaging it in behind-the-times design? So please, USDA and Mrs. Obama, give people a little more credit. Give us some meat–er, protein–to grab onto. Here’s hoping that version 2.0 feels more alive and interactive. I’m still hungry.

Post to Twitter

“Bikini Bodies” & The Ugh of Swimsuit Season

1942

For years, I dreaded the arrival of spring magazines, knowing they’d be filled with pages of flirty, colorful and teeny bikinis fitted to fat-free model bodies. I was a girl with cellulite, Beyonce thighs (when she’s eating her favorite southern dishes, that is) and a tum that more than coquettishly peeped over the waistband of any bikini bottom. Well into my 20s, my beach uniform was always a one-piece, usually topped by an oversized T-shirt or tank top and shorts. I hated that moment when everyone sat down and disrobed, casually eyeing how the others looked nearly-naked, our brains registering a comparison to the culture’s ideal. The pressure of exposing my body in public was enough to convince even a sun- and sand-lover like me to stay on the cement.

I had an epiphany at 27, when I decided to say “f— it” and wear a size-16 bikini. Proudly. Publicly. I called myself a “body outlaw” and held my head high. Hey world, here’s a body you don’t usually see in a swimsuit. Get used to it.

Oddly, the biggest revelation was that NOBODY CARED. How liberating: I’d wasted so many years imprisoned by shame and fear of being ridiculed, when I could have been out frolicing in my dimple-thighed, two-piece glory.

Granted, the bikini had boy shorts and a generously-cut top. And I was at a southern Pennsylvania water park, not on a St.-Tropez yacht rocking a thong with the “glitterati” (who made up that word, anyway?). But for the ten years since then, I’ve publicly worn bikinis while ranging from size 10 to 16, and have encouraged people to challenge the idea that only certain body types have the right to bare arms…and legs, and thighs, and stomachs.

What kind of body is a “bikini body”? The enlightened answer: any kind that wants to be.

The other answer, which we’re all palpably aware of (and shamed en masse into obeying), is much more narrow. Flat stomach. Slightly jutting hip bones. Bronze skin. Unpuckered thighs.

In recent years, swimsuit issues have included conciliatory pages of “flaw”-disguising options. (Lycra: the 21st century corset!). I’m grateful for more flattering cuts, yes, especially the Marilyn Monroe-era throwbacks. I’ve since discovered a ton of awesome 1940s-inspired swimsuits that I encourage any fellow thick-chick to try, especially since they’re more feminine than the boxy boy-cut look, and more sophisticated than the Snookified loincloth-on-a-string.

In spite of the growing embrace of styles from the curvier pinup girl era, the mass market offerings continue to have a distinctly Malibu Barbie feel. I was disturbed this week when Disney actress Demi Lovato, 18, Tweeted a photo of herself in a small white bikini, crowing, “Here’s my bikini time body!” Lovato, the star of Camp Rock and Sonny with a Chance (which I’ve watched with my 11-year-old stepdaughter) was just released from a treatment center for cutting, anorexia, and bulimia.

According to People.com: “I’ve been working so hard to get healthy and fit,” Lovato, 18, Tweeted on Monday, linking to a photo of herself strutting in a teeny-weeny white bikini. “I can’t believe I’m about to [post] this but I’m so excited… Here’s my bikini time body!”

Yikes. Was nothing learned in treatment, Demi? What Lovato is really saying, I believe, is: “Hey, look at me. Am I okay? Please validate me.” It worked: she got an outpouring of Twitter support telling her how great she looked. But the whole point of recovery was missed. If that hole in her soul was really filled, she wouldn’t need to make such a desperate bid for outside approval of her body. Yet, People.com casts this move as “the Disney star [being] excited to show she has her life and physique under control.”

Control. Interesting choice of words, given that this is one of the driving forces of eating disorders.

I also feel raw embarrassment for the girl. In my own way, I know what it’s like to think you’re kinda hot stuff, only to be told that you’re not—before you’ve developed enough of an identity to dismiss the hurtful words. Still, I wish someone had snatched away Demi’s smartphone before she could hit “share”—if only for the sake of her fans. Saddling an 18-year-old with social responsibility for little girls’ self-esteem is a losing proposition—and unfair, I know. Yet, the confusing message is there in Lovato’s vulnerable face and strange, wrestler-girl stance: how you look matters more than how healthy you are. Looking good in a bikini is a sign of good mental and physical health.

The eating-disordered mentality is a lot harder to shed than the behaviors that accompany it. Lovato, like so many young women, seems like a genuinely talented and spunky person. She may have just caved to pressure, switched off her lights, and started focusing on her looks. Been there.

There’s nothing like “bikini season” to terrorize even the most talented woman into a spiral of shame and self-hatred. We don’t have to go there, but we’re gonna need some armor. What are you planning to do this year, if you’re someone who feels bad about herself during this season? How can you make a body-positive statement? Tell us!

More on ‘Bikini Bodies’:

Loving Your Body During Bathing Suit Season

The Right to Wear Bikinis: Who Owns It?

Post to Twitter

Using Cosmetic Surgery Stop Bullying?

earsbullying

A few weeks ago, ABCNews.com reported an article “When Is Cosmetic Surgery the Answer to Bullyling?” (Um, never?) We particularly liked this smart response by blogger Shark-Fu of Angry Black Bitch, who allowed us to reprint this with her permission.

When I was a wee bitch I was bullied mercilessly for all things related to my blackness.  When they made fun of my hair, I cut it off in an attempt to make it look more like the bob that was the trend at the time.  When they made fun of my ashy knees, I meticulously rubbed lotion into my skin before school.  When they made fun of my lips I tried to fold them inward…that didn’t last long.
Ultimately my bullies focused on my blackness as a whole – I was different and I could not change, so I thought that the best I could hope for was to conform as much as possible and get rewarded for not being as black as some of the other students who came to school through the desegregation program.
Country black trumped city black, but black was still worthy of bullying.
By the time I hit Junior High I realized that I had accepted the unacceptable – that these assholes set the agenda and had the rest of us scrambling to meet their standards so we could make the constant taunts, physical abuse, and harassment stop.  I decided that was bullshit and stopped trying, but I lost a lot to those years of bullying.
Here’s the thing – the same young people who are having surgery to make their ears stick out less will likely be the same young people who will find out that their hair isn’t just so, their clothes aren’t up to par, or their [insert anything here] offends the same horrible little shit who used to make fun of their ears.
Here’s another thing – bullying hurts more than just the person being bullied.  Bullying distracts from class work…it creates a climate of fear and intimidation…and, if left unchecked, it creates grown ass people who bully because they were young people who bullied.
I understand the attraction of cosmetic surgery as a solution to your child getting teased about their ears.  It’s gotta be hard to see your child miserable because of something like how their ears are positioned on their head.
But cosmetic surgery isn’t the solution to bullying.
Cosmetic surgery is a solution for some people who have ears that stick out and want to change that.
We need to shift our thinking on this shit.  We need to focus on the bully and ask ourselves why they aren’t being asked to change.  And we need to deal with the fact that bullies will bully until bullies are taught not to bully.
Eventually the bully will move on to something that isn’t changeable…to something that isn’t fixable through an expensive surgery and painful recovery.
Because bullies bully until bullies are taught not to bully.
When we start down the road of changing ourselves to appease bullies we being a journey that will never end and that puts the responsibility for being harassed on the survivor rather than on the person who desperately needs some home training and likely needs therapy.
This is the “solution” that has people blaming the gay kid for acting too gay…the black kid for not acting too black…the fat kid for not losing weight…the woman for dressing in a provocative manner…the deaf kid for not dedicating her life to making hearing people more comfortable…and so forth and so on until finally the bullies of the world are satisfied.
But the bullies of the world will never be satisfied.
Bullies bully until whatever the fuck kind of insecurity and/or self-hate they are avoiding dealing with is dealt with.
Pause…sip coffee…continue.
Surgery will be a solution for bullying when doctors discover the Bully Tumor and create a surgery to remove that rancid shit.
Until then…well, now that those ears have been “fixed” I’ve noticed how large the nose is and you could lose some weight and your hair is too short and you “act gay” and why are your feet so big and…
And…
And.
Blink.

Reprinted with permission from Angry Black Bitch

Related content:

You’re So Perfect…Except For Your Boobs

Plastic Wrap – Turning Against Cosmetic Surgery

Sweet Revenge?

Hollywood Now Seeks Authenticity

Is a ‘Bo-Tax’ Unfair to Women Who Want Their Looks to Compete?

Terrifying Trend: Models and Mini-Liposuction

Huffington Post: Former Miss Argentina Dies From Cosmetic Butt Surgery

Ironing Out the Wrinkles of Wanting Plastic Surgery

Post to Twitter

Khloe Can’t Keep Up with the Kardashians’ Body Standards

khloek

I admit it: I kind of keep up with the sisters K. It’s fascinating to watch size, class, race and gender issues all publicly collide in a series of ever-spinning spinoffs. Here are the olive-skinned Kardashians of ambiguous ethnicity, “white” and up-speaking enough to hang with the L.A. celebutantes, yet bootylicious and wealthy enough to date/marry men of any culture they choose without getting racially pigeonholed. [I've already edited myself a few times over, trying to find a politically correct way of saying this...and I just can't.] In an innocuous wrapper of “(rich) girls who just wanna have fun,” they push so many sociological hot buttons. Yet, with their unself-conscious dialogue and insecurities caught on tape, it’s hard not to like them—even as I envy their perfect hair, couture outfits and bottomless bank accounts.

I have a special soft spot for Khloe, who always gets shit when her weight fails to distribute to the most marketable places on her body. You know, like Kim’s oversexualized, Venus-of-Hottentot rear does—the one that everyone’s padding their bony tushes to imitate. (Jennifer Lopez? I’ll raise ya one cheek better.) I loved the episode where Khloe posed naked for a PETA billboard, talking openly about her body image issues and the pain of being compared to her sisters. She really grasped the concept of being a role model for other women, which I thought was cool.

So I was incensed to watch a clip from the latest Khloe & Lamar episode, where Khloe fields a call from Mama Jenner berating her for gaining weight. At first, Kris beefs about how Khloe’s “presenting herself to the media” and “what it’s doing to the brand.” When pressed for specifics, Kris admits to a fear that Khloe’s newlywed poundage could jeopardize the sisters’ lucrative endorsement deal with diet supplement QuickTrim.

“I work so hard at creating…a great deal for you girls,” says Kris. “And you’re not pulling your end of the weight here…I feel like you could not chat [to the media] about how many cookies you eat between meals.”

See the clip:

“Are you trying to say that I’m fat and I’m f—ing up your s—?” yells Khloe. Well, yes. And herein lies the dark side of being a Kardashian. It means you’re a commodity, always on the auction block, and a well-paid slave to the industry’s demands. Quite a trade-off. As sassy and liberated as the “girls” may act, THEY can’t even keep up with the Kardashian Machine anymore. It’s interesting to watch the whole house of cards start to crumble as Khloe moves away from her mother’s profiteering and into her own plans to start a family.

This episode underscored the things I wish the media would acknowledge:
1. Diets don’t work, and they certainly aren’t sustainable.
QuickTrim, fat burners, Biggest Losers, Celebrity Fit Club…how long can we stay on the treadmill, Atkins, South Beach or other quick-fixers that have nothing to really do with health and only with the cult of thinness?

2. Mothers play a vital role in their daughters’ body image.
As a new mom myself, I’m super-conscious of this. I don’t say things like “losing the baby weight” around my 11-year-old stepdaughter, either. It was disturbing to hear Kris Jenner project her standards onto her grown daughter—especially given that she supplied Khloe with half of her diet-resistant DNA. Upping the ick factor: referring to your own child as a “brand.”

3. Money can make people crazier than food.
Reality shows’ endless quest to be impossibly rich and thin may work for the Real Housewives. For the Kardashians, whose Armenian genes were honed for heartiness over the centuries (and their “new money” came a lot more recently), notsomuch. Watching Kris Jenner ink deal after deal for her daughters is like witnessing someone with a food addiction: it’s never enough. Doesn’t matter what you’re endorsing–diet pills, video gaming systems, cake mix, as long as the checks come in. Binge eaters fill a void with mindless food consumption. For both, the emptiness is always there. Then there’s the bargaining: if I “cheat” on my diet, I’ll work out twice as long later and fast all weekend. Or, just pimp out your daughters, let them starve in public and binge on cookies under the covers to keep Kar-Ka$h-ian in.

I’m in the middle of reading Geneen Roth’s great new book Lost and Found: Unexpected Revelations About Food and Money, which I highly recommend. Another great book is Jennifer Pozner’s Reality Bites Back: The Troubling Truth About Guilty Pleasure TV. For as long at the E! channel should be renamed the K! channel, I’ll probably keep an eye on this family, deconstructing them like a tender osso bucco–the kind I’ll bet Khloe would gladly dig into with us.

What do you think of the clip…and the latest Kardashian dash for thinness?

Related content:

Pop Culture’s Relentless Battle with Body Image

The Reality Behind the Quest to be “The Biggest Loser”

What Reality TV Taught Me About Sluts, Waifs, Douchebags and Angry Black Women

TV’s Fat and Happy. Not Quite.

Post to Twitter

The Right to Wear Bikinis: Who Owns It?

Screen shot 2011-04-06 at 12.48.55 PM

File this one under “clueless media moment”: today’s People.com features Sara Rue, host of the wish-they-wouldn’t-go-there reality show Shedding for the Wedding, triumphantly showing off her weight loss in a bikini.

“Only a year and a half after she began the Jenny Craig program, Sara Rue has lost more than 50 lbs. – and 4 dress sizes! – and is wearing a bikini for the very first time in her life,” says the article [italics theirs].

Emphasis on “the very first time”–as if wearing a bikini is a rite of passage reserved only for women who shave those unwanted pounds off their asses in time for bikini season (and their weddings). Listen, we support Sara if she feels healthy and confident. But why does the media insist on tying happiness to thinness? They are not one and the same. And to Sara we say, great that you’re wearing a bikini (it’s a cute one)…but why is this the first time EVER?

When I was a size 14-16 one summer, I made an executive decision to override body shame and wear a bikini in public. I realized that I automatically assumed that I “couldn’t” wear one — that because I had some love handles and a round stomach that I didn’t have the RIGHT to feel the sun’s rays on my tum. I decided to defy that. I named myself a “body outlaw”, opting out of society’s standards and making my own choices, even if some people might see me and think “gross!” or “she should NOT be wearing that.” And while my brain fired off plenty of body-hating messages, I forced myself to hold my head high. It was revolutionary in its own way for me.

The other problem with this bikini brouhaha is that the dieter’s lifestyle is not sustainable. In fact, 98% of people who lose weight regain it all within 5 years, and 90% of them regain more than they lost. Bummer for all of us on the constant treadmill, huh? Even Sara Rue herself admits it to People.com. “It’s hard. It’s a struggle,” she says of keeping off the weight. “There are days where I’ll say, ‘I feel off the rails.’ But I don’t give myself excuses.”

Excuses? Is that what we call acknowledging our desires and appetites when our bodies don’t cooperate and hide the “shameful” evidence of weight?

Then, there’s the whole wedding thing, throwing another ideal into the mix. The dieting, bridal and advertising industry have enjoyed their menage-a-trois for ages. It’s profitable, after all. And here’s another “ugh” part from this piece:

Come May, when Rue exchanges vows with her fiancé, college consultant Kevin Price, 35, she won’t be skipping her wedding cake. “We’re having three kinds, including red velvet and pumpkin caramel,” Rue reveals. “I’ll be having one of each! Very small slivers of every kind is the way to go.”

Excuse me? You’re only going to get married (hopefully) once in your life, and you’ll just eat a small SLIVER of your own wedding cake? Is the decision to skip cake based on true HEALTH (which includes emotional happiness and pleasure)? Or on a desire to stay thin and keep earning a Hollywood paycheck–in an industry that doesn’t have many roles for those who veer from its ideal?

People.com, we beg you, please be a tad less celebratory and unquestioning in your coverage of weight loss stories. We understand it sells magazines and gets clicks. But it also sends a damaging message to women, yet again.

 

For more information on the issue of ‘Bikini Bodies’…

The Ugh of Swimsuit Season

Loving your body during bathing suit season

 

Post to Twitter

Period Panties & Body Shame: An OCD Journey Through My Underwear Drawer

panties

by Ophira Edut

 

Today, a small revolution happened. And it was in my underwear drawer.

I threw out a pair of baggy, stretched-out, used-to-be-bikini but now verging on “granny panties” underwear that I bought at Gap Body literally a decade ago. They were cute in their heyday, light blue with flowers. And they’ve lived resolutely in the back of my lingerie drawer (which is tiny to begin with) since their decline in 2003. From time to time, I reach to toss them, then hesitate and turn away.

I’ve justified this OCD behavior by blaming biology: I need a couple pairs of “period panties” so I don’t mess up the expensive ones during the heavier days of my cycle. And they aren’t the only pair I’ve been hoarding since the start of the millennium.

This morning, I was getting dressed for a meeting, one that justified the donning of “good” underwear. It’s spring, so I’m in the mood for a fresh start. In fact, I bought a couple new pairs of undies at Nordstrom Rack this weekend, priced at a modest $2.97 per pair. So I finally decided to get stern with myself: the beat-up bottoms had to go.

Oddly, as I dropped them in the trash, I felt a wave of panic and fear. I knew there were a couple more pairs that deserved to go (the mint green ones with the ripped-up cotton crotch, the pink ones wearing thin in the rear). Yet, I just…couldn’t. So I sat down here to explore some obviously deeper underlying issues. Here’s what I’ve come up with:

1. I’m saving them for a “special occasion,” rather than treating every moment of my life as a celebration.
I grew up with grandparents who survived the Holocaust, whose well-to-do families lost all their money and social status in Europe fleeing the Nazis. Some of that survivor consciousness was passed along to me. Safe in America, my grandparents prided themselves on living modestly–no doubt a protection against the pain of losing everything. My grandpa told stories of how his mother made whale and horse meat sandwiches (which he’d quietly discard on the way to school), or how all he ate was potatoes for weeks at a stretch.

While I’m grateful to have learned moderation, I also grew up in 1970s and 80s American excess. So the commercials that interrupted The Smurfs and The Brady Bunch told me to “buy buy buy” and “eat eat eat,” but my family called me spoiled and greedy for desiring these things. I had play clothes and school clothes from mid-priced stores like JCPenney. But the outfits I REALLY wanted to wear had to be saved for a Jewish holiday that fell once a year, or for Shabbat dinner on Friday night, when we dressed up and went to my grandparents’ house (where none of my friends could see how cute I looked).

I’ve read articles by stylish, emotionally secure women who say their secret to happiness is eating on the good china every day, even if it’s macaroni and cheese. I’ve dabbled with dressing up “for no good reason.” On one of the days that I did this, I met the man who’s now my husband. It wasn’t because of my outfit, but because I was radiating self-love–by opting out of this compulsive money-food-pleasure “mishegas” (that’s Yiddish for craziness).

2. Depriving myself of pleasure makes me feel “in  control.”
Ooh. Echoes of my teenage disordered eating habits, when I felt in control by depriving myself, pushing away the rich foods I craved to get my curvy Jewish body to conform to a thinner ideal. How long could I go without binge eating? How much could I sustain a rumbling belly so I could zip up jeans a size smaller?

This was what I called willpower. And it really feels like insanity. Truly, my behavior around my underwear is irrational–I can see that. Yet, I’m holding on. Maybe that’s because…


3. These are the “safe” panties to wear when I don’t feel like being sexualized.

In college, I experienced a couple of date rapes, and though it’s been 20 years, some of the patterns are still etched into the way I shield or protect my body. Subconsciously, I want to control WHEN and HOW I’m seen as sexy, when my body is (or isn’t) available for intimacy. I’m sensitive to being seen as a sex object, rather than a whole person. Even though I’m married, I still struggle with barriers, boundaries and a slippery desire to control how others view me.

I guess I internalized some shame, a misguided belief that I somehow “allowed” the rapes to happen, even though I’m well-educated about sexual assault and intellectually know that it’s not the victim’s fault. However, it’s not something that I talk or write about much, because I assume it will make people uncomfortable, or (again) change the way they see me, which I obviously want to control. I’ve even forgiven the guys that did that, knowing now that they were also clueless 20-year-olds who, like most Americans, never learned about sexual respect, women’s rights or that a girl who wants you to find her desirable (especially in sexy underwear) doesn’t necessarily want you to take them off without her permission.

A woman I know who was sexually abused as a child told me that she used to wear seven pairs of underwear at a time as a way of psychologically protecting herself. So maybe there’s more to this than I thought.

As the mother of a 6-month-old daughter and stepmom to an 11-year-old girl, I’m even more sensitive now to how the media sexualizes girls and women. I’m reading a great book called So Sexy So Soon (recommended!) that really distinguishes being sexual (implying choice, agency, agreement) and sexualized (which is imposed upon us by outside sources). This is part of the education our world sorely needs.

4. I’m holding onto the past.
I bought these particular panties during a sexually confident time in my life, my late 20s, when I was experimental and free. More than anything, I finally felt liberated from the “baggage” of those painful post-date-rape years, when I needed tons of reassurance from boyfriends and would often cry in bed. Finally, I could have normal relationships without the past attacking me in the midst of a passionate makeout session.

Dropping my 2001 panties  in the trash was akin to saying goodbye to that empowered part of my life. Again, there’s my scarcity–the idea that I can’t make new memories, or ever feel that way again. I have a 6-month-old daughter now. I’m 38. I’m supposedly “too old” to feel THAT desirable, since I’m no longer in the bloom of the youth that our culture worships.

Yet, what’s behind feeling desirable in that Madison Avenue kind of way? It involves giving my power away to a sex partner, or a damn pair of panties. In truth, I could just put on the new ones I bought and rekindle that confident spark simply because I’m adorning my body—my body at 38—instead of living in the past.

But it will take something. It will take some conscious inner dialogue, some reckoning with the mean voices in my head (A Course in Miracles calls them “attack thoughts”) that speak up first. It will take adjusting my eyes and my mind to embrace my reflection, rather than comparing it to the idealized image in my head. It’s not easy, ans sometimes, it takes everything I’ve got to talk back.

5. I need perks.
I’m an overachiever, like most people who have any kind of body image issues. So I guess I can work with that trait. Never underestimate the power of a reward system for us accomplishment-driven types. I can gift myself for tossing the old undies.  I will replace each one with a new pair. (I mean seriously, they’re three bucks.)

6. I need support.
I did a course in 2010 called Mama Gena’s School of Womanly Arts, which was a fascinating, sometimes challenging foray into reclaiming that “divine feminine” in us all. The 250 participants and I were called Sister Goddesses, and the community was incredibly nurturing and supportive. One of our assignments was to revamp our underwear drawers, chucking out anything that didn’t make us feel like goddesses incarnate.

I cheated.

In an attempt to have my cake and eat it too, I asked my friend Margaret Shrum, a.k.a. The Lingerie Goddess (www.thelingeriegoddess.com) to take me shopping at a beautiful store called Journelle. I was pregnant. In typical martyr-woman mode, I could justify splurging on a couple pretty bras and panties while my body was being inhabited by someone else, too. Do it for “them” but not for myself. (Sorry. I just have to pause and say I kind of hate the word “panties.” Substitution suggestions welcomed.)

Having Margaret in the dressing room with me was uncomfortable for a minute, but then, it felt so supportive. I found myself turning her into an amateur therapist as I confessed how hard it was for me to “indulge” like this. She got it in a big way; apparently, I wasn’t alone.

In three weeks, I’m being taken on a “pleasure date” by Pamela Madsen, author of Shameless: How I Ditched the Diet, Got Naked, Found True Pleasure…and Somehow Got Home in Time to Cook Dinner. I opened up to Pamela about my struggles, and she generously offered to help me have another breakthrough here. I’ll write about it and report!

I realize I’m talking openly about things that women have been taught to be ashamed of: Menstruation. Sexual abuse. Leaks and stains and spills and vaginal fluids. Icky, icky things we have to hide, pretending that our lady parts are waxed and clean and ready for their close-up in a glossy “gentleman’s” magazine.

I guess I need some new strategies for feeling sexually empowered. My ratty underwear has served as armor, but what’s the battle I’m fighting? Turns out, it’s not just against society, but against my own body, too. It’s the women’s war to define sexuality on our own terms–somehow–in a world that sexualizes us, and values us based on the “currency” of how desirable we are to others. In the long run, it’s put a damper on my experience of feeling connected to my body.

So, I’m bravely heading to my dresser to say a farewell to the mint green and pink pairs now. I will honor and thank them for their protection and let them know that they’ll be missed. Then, I’m going to have some fun (imagine that!) replacing them with a well-deserved upgrade.

Related content:

A Place for Me: Art, Porn, Feminism, and Race

Sex, My Body and Giving it Up

The Naked Clam and Other Preposterous Pubic Hair Problems

 

Post to Twitter

Annoying Trend: Celebs Play Dumb About Body Image

images

By Ophira Edut

“I don’t get this obsession with weight,” Eva Longoria Parker tells Glamour (February, 2009). The actress, whose tight outfits inspired tabloids to speculate that she’s pregnant, is the latest actress to pretend that she just doesn’t understand the whole “thin is in” fuss.

It’s a party line that was echoed by Heidi Klum and Pete Wentz, when a more zaftig Jessica Simpson was pictured at a recent event. Leave her alone, stop focusing on people’s looks, isn’t it about inner beauty, blah blah blah.

To me this is just a load of the same Hollywood crap. You work in an industry that demands you fit a tightly-scripted image, and that can pick from a hearty crop of size-zero replacements if your ass gets too big. And you’re telling me you don’t get what the big deal is? Suuuure.

That’s like me, a White Jew, saying, “I don’t get the obsession with race. We’re all human. It’s just a skin color.” Well, the very reason I can say that is because I live in a world of white privilege, where I have the luxury of being “color-blind.” I’m not a target of racism, so how would I know its realities firsthand?

If you happen to be Heidi Klum, or anyone who fits those pre-scripted images–usually with the secret weapon of a team of chefs, fitness trainers, and plastic surgeons–you add insult to injury by claiming weight is not a big deal. The remaining 98 percent of the population is busting our butts trying look like you, and we often feel like crap because we don’t. So I don’t need Heidi telling me to love myself the way I am, any more than Michelle Obama would want my advice on how to be a powerful Black woman.

I would have a lot more respect if one of these actresses (besides Kate Winslet) had the guts to say,”The media is screwed, the body image standards are horrifyingly narrow, and I participate in this industry because I love the work, I love the paycheck, and I love the attention. It’s screwed up, and I still do it.” At least we’d have some honesty, instead of another bullshit platitude.

Related content:

Michael Jackson: Another Victim of the Fame Game

Lady Gaga’s “Born This Way”: Racist or Revolutionary?

Gabby Sidibe in Bazaar: Curvy in Couture

Body image gets animated: What The Simpsons and Family Guy say about beauty

Music’s New Bold and Bountiful

The Truth About Celebrity Weight Loss

Margaret Cho on Drop Dead Diva and the Power of Reclaiming Beauty

Three Cheers for Kate!

‘Sex and the City’ and Body Image

Post to Twitter